diff --git a/pep-0000.txt b/pep-0000.txt
index 3aaeeaab6..3543dbbff 100644
--- a/pep-0000.txt
+++ b/pep-0000.txt
@@ -82,7 +82,6 @@ Index by Category
  S   268  Extended HTTP functionality and WebDAV       Stein
  S   275  Switching on Multiple Values                 Lemburg
  S   280  Optimizing access to globals                 GvR
- S   284  Integer for-loops                            Eppstein, Ewing
  S   286  Enhanced Argument Tuples                     von Loewis
  I   287  reStructuredText Docstring Format            Goodger
  S   294  Type Names in the types Module               Tirosh
@@ -200,6 +199,7 @@ Index by Category
  SR  271  Prefixing sys.path by command line option    Giacometti
  SR  274  Dict Comprehensions                          Warsaw
  SR  276  Simple Iterator for ints                     Althoff
+ SR  284  Integer for-loops                            Eppstein, Ewing
  SR  288  Generators Attributes and Exceptions         Hettinger
  SR  295  Interpretation of multiline string constants Koltsov
  SR  296  Adding a bytes Object Type                   Gilbert
@@ -326,7 +326,7 @@ Numerical Index
  SR  281  Loop Counter Iteration with range and xrange Hetland
  SF  282  A Logging System                             Sajip, Mick
  IF  283  Python 2.3 Release Schedule                  GvR
- S   284  Integer for-loops                            Eppstein, Ewing
+ SR  284  Integer for-loops                            Eppstein, Ewing
  SF  285  Adding a bool type                           GvR
  S   286  Enhanced Argument Tuples                     von Loewis
  I   287  reStructuredText Docstring Format            Goodger
diff --git a/pep-0284.txt b/pep-0284.txt
index 86779ecd2..efc578623 100644
--- a/pep-0284.txt
+++ b/pep-0284.txt
@@ -27,6 +27,17 @@ Abstract
     values of var that make the comparison true, starting from the
     left endpoint of the given interval.
 
+Pronouncement
+
+    This PEP is rejected.  There were a number of fixable issues with
+    the proposal (see the fixups listed in Raymond Hettinger's
+    python-dev post on 18 June 2005).  However, even with the fixups the
+    proposal did not garner support.  Specifically, Guido did not buy
+    the premise that the range() format needed fixing, "The whole point
+    (15 years ago) of range() was to *avoid* needing syntax to specify a
+    loop over numbers. I think it's worked out well and there's nothing
+    that needs to be fixed (except range() needs to become an interator,
+    which it will in Python 3.0)."
 
 Rationale