diff --git a/pep-0451.txt b/pep-0451.txt index 399902806..56c060a82 100644 --- a/pep-0451.txt +++ b/pep-0451.txt @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ Type: Standards Track Content-Type: text/x-rst Created: 8-Aug-2013 Python-Version: 3.4 -Post-History: 8-Aug-2013, 28-Aug-2013, 18-Sep-2013 +Post-History: 8-Aug-2013, 28-Aug-2013, 18-Sep-2013, 24-Sep-2013 Resolution: @@ -58,7 +58,7 @@ it can load, as well as about data from sources associated with such a module. Right now loaders (via load_module()) are responsible for certain -boilerplate import-related operations. These are: +boilerplate, import-related operations. These are: 1. perform some (module-related) validation; 2. create the module object; @@ -76,7 +76,7 @@ origin This is a new term and concept. The idea of it exists subtly in the import system already, but this proposal makes the concept explicit. -"origin" is the import context means the system (or resource within a +"origin" in an import context means the system (or resource within a system) from which a module originates. For the purposes of this proposal, "origin" is also a string which identifies such a resource or system. "origin" is applicable to all modules. @@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ PEP 3147. For this proposal, the relevant API for module caching is the ``__cache__`` attribute of modules and the cache_from_source() function in importlib.util. Loaders are responsible for putting modules into the cache (and loading out of the cache). Currently the cache is only used -for compiled source modules. However, this proposal explicitly allows +for compiled source modules. However, loaders may take advantage of +the module cache for other kinds of modules. package ------- @@ -141,7 +142,7 @@ package The concept does not change, nor does the term. However, the distinction between modules and packages is mostly superficial. Packages *are* modules. They simply have a ``__path__`` attribute and -import may add attributes bound to submodules. The typical perceived +import may add attributes bound to submodules. The typically perceived difference is a source of confusion. This proposal explicitly de-emphasizes the distinction between packages and modules where it makes sense to do so. @@ -273,12 +274,6 @@ finders. See the `Factory Functions`_ section below for more detail. * from_loader(name, loader, \*, origin=None, is_package=None) - build a spec with missing information filled in by using loader APIs. -This factory function is useful for some backward-compatibility -situations: - -* spec_from_module(module, loader=None) - build a spec based on the - import-related attributes of an existing module. - Other API Additions ------------------- @@ -332,10 +327,12 @@ Other Changes * The import system implementation in importlib will be changed to make use of ModuleSpec. * importlib.reload() will make use of ModuleSpec. -* Import-related module attributes (other than ``__spec__``) will no - longer be used directly by the import system. +* A module's import-related attributes (other than ``__spec__``) will no + longer be used directly by the import system during that module's + import. However, this does not impact use of those attributes + (e.g. ``__path__``) when loading other modules (e.g. submodules). * Import-related attributes should no longer be added to modules - directly. + directly, except by the import system. * The module type's ``__repr__()`` will be a thin wrapper around a pure Python implementation which will leverage ModuleSpec. * The spec for the ``__main__`` module will reflect the appropriate @@ -459,8 +456,11 @@ functionality:: sys.modues[spec.name] = module try: spec.loader.exec_module(module) - except Exception: - del sys.modules[spec.name] + except BaseException: + try: + del sys.modules[spec.name] + except KeyError: + pass raise return sys.modules[spec.name] @@ -599,17 +599,6 @@ related module attributes. See the table in `Attributes`_. Omitted Attributes and Methods ------------------------------ -The following ModuleSpec methods are not part of the public API since -it is easy to use them incorrectly and only the import system really -needs them (i.e. they would be an attractive nuisance). - -* _create() - provide a new module to use for loading. -* _exec(module) - execute the spec into a module namespace. -* _load() - prepare a module and execute it in a protected way. -* _reload(module) - re-execute a module in a protected way. - -Here are other omissions: - There is no "PathModuleSpec" subclass of ModuleSpec that separates out has_location, cached, and submodule_search_locations. While that might make the separation cleaner, module objects don't have that distinction.