Remove the revrange() proposal.

pep-0322.txt

@@ -159,17 +159,6 @@ library and comments on why reverse iteration was necessary:
   underlying list is altered during iteration.
 
 
-Active Alternative
-==================
-
-A simpler, but limited alternative is to create a builtin that takes
-the same arguments as *range()* but returns a reverse iterator over the
-range.  The idea is that much of the benefit of *reversed()* comes
-reducing the intellectual effort it takes to express the arguments for
-[x]range() when going backwards.  A good name is needed for this
-alternative -- *revrange()* is cleanest so far.
-
-
 Rejected Alternatives
 =====================