From 2aa8101ec1af9e4b69a3ed09c75ed6d8ae800cb6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Christopher H.Barker, PhD" Date: Wed, 1 Nov 2017 16:37:43 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] fixed a (critical) typo (#445) I somehow had "smaller" for both the weak and strong cases -- not sure I let that slip through originally --- pep-0485.txt | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pep-0485.txt b/pep-0485.txt index c6413f7da..25f4dbc70 100644 --- a/pep-0485.txt +++ b/pep-0485.txt @@ -390,7 +390,7 @@ there was no benefit to the method worth reducing the range of functionality or adding the complexity of checking values to determine the order of computation. -This leaves the boost "weak" test (2)-- or using the smaller value to +This leaves the boost "weak" test (2)-- or using the larger value to scale the tolerance, or the Boost "strong" (3) test, which uses the smaller of the values to scale the tolerance. For small tolerance, they yield the same result, but this proposal uses the boost "weak"