Minor grammatical typos found by Eric Smith and R. David Murray.
This commit is contained in:
parent
21f4e2df33
commit
2c59151492
|
@ -1491,13 +1491,13 @@ Git was not chosen for three key reasons (see the `PyCon 2009
|
|||
lightning talk <http://pycon.blip.tv/file/1947231/>`_ where Brett
|
||||
Cannon lists these exact reasons; talk started at 3:45). First, git's
|
||||
Windows support is the weakest out of the three DVCSs being considered
|
||||
which unacceptable as Python needs to support development on any
|
||||
which is unacceptable as Python needs to support development on any
|
||||
platform it runs on. Since Python runs on Windows and some people do
|
||||
develop on the platform it needs solid support. And while git's
|
||||
support is improving, as of this moment it is the weakest by a large
|
||||
enough margin to warrant it a problem.
|
||||
enough margin to warrant considering it a problem.
|
||||
|
||||
Two, and just as important as the first issue, is that the Python
|
||||
Second, and just as important as the first issue, is that the Python
|
||||
core developers liked git the least out of the three DVCS options by a
|
||||
wide margin. If you look at the following table you will see the
|
||||
results of a survey taken of the core developers and how by a large
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue