Minor grammatical typos found by Eric Smith and R. David Murray.

This commit is contained in:
Brett Cannon 2009-06-02 19:13:32 +00:00
parent 21f4e2df33
commit 2c59151492
1 changed files with 3 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -1491,13 +1491,13 @@ Git was not chosen for three key reasons (see the `PyCon 2009
lightning talk <http://pycon.blip.tv/file/1947231/>`_ where Brett lightning talk <http://pycon.blip.tv/file/1947231/>`_ where Brett
Cannon lists these exact reasons; talk started at 3:45). First, git's Cannon lists these exact reasons; talk started at 3:45). First, git's
Windows support is the weakest out of the three DVCSs being considered Windows support is the weakest out of the three DVCSs being considered
which unacceptable as Python needs to support development on any which is unacceptable as Python needs to support development on any
platform it runs on. Since Python runs on Windows and some people do platform it runs on. Since Python runs on Windows and some people do
develop on the platform it needs solid support. And while git's develop on the platform it needs solid support. And while git's
support is improving, as of this moment it is the weakest by a large support is improving, as of this moment it is the weakest by a large
enough margin to warrant it a problem. enough margin to warrant considering it a problem.
Two, and just as important as the first issue, is that the Python Second, and just as important as the first issue, is that the Python
core developers liked git the least out of the three DVCS options by a core developers liked git the least out of the three DVCS options by a
wide margin. If you look at the following table you will see the wide margin. If you look at the following table you will see the
results of a survey taken of the core developers and how by a large results of a survey taken of the core developers and how by a large