Merge from upstream.

This commit is contained in:
Carl Meyer 2012-03-12 15:21:02 -07:00
commit 30e43d697f
5 changed files with 83 additions and 4 deletions

View File

@ -46,6 +46,13 @@ The current schedule is:
- 2.7 rc2 2010-06-19
- 2.7 final 2010-07-03
Maintenance releases
====================
- 2.7.1 2010-11-27
- 2.7.2 2011-07-21
- 2.7.3rc1 2012-02-23
Possible features for 2.7
=========================

View File

@ -79,7 +79,9 @@ Candidate PEPs:
* PEP 382: Namespace Packages
* PEP 395: Module Aliasing
* PEP 397: Python launcher for Windows
* PEP 412: Key-Sharing Dictionary
* PEP 3143: Standard daemon process library
* PEP 3144: IP Address manipulation library
(Note that these are not accepted yet and even if they are, they might
not be finished in time for Python 3.3.)

View File

@ -8,7 +8,7 @@ Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 13-Jun-2011
Python-Version: 3.3
Post-History: 24-Oct-2011, 28-Oct-2011
Post-History: 24-Oct-2011, 28-Oct-2011, 06-Mar-2012
Abstract

View File

@ -20,9 +20,8 @@ Rationale
=========
A frozendict is a read-only mapping: a key cannot be added nor removed, and a
key is always mapped to the same value. However, frozendict values can be
mutable (not hashable). A frozendict is hashable and so immutable if and only
if all values are hashable (immutable).
key is always mapped to the same value. However, frozendict values can be not
hashable. A frozendict is hashable if and only if all values are hashable.
Use cases:

71
pep-0417.txt Normal file
View File

@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
PEP: 417
Title: Including mock in the Standard Library
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Michael Foord <michael@python.org>
Status: Draft
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/plain
Created: 12-Mar-2012
Python-Version: 3.3
Post-History: 12-Mar-2012
Abstract
This PEP proposes adding the mock [1]_ testing library
to the Python standard library as ``unittest.mock``.
Rationale
Creating mock objects for testing is a common need in Python.
Many developers create ad-hoc mocks, as needed, in their test
suites. This is currently what we do in the Python test suite,
where a standardised mock object library would be helpful.
There are many mock object libraries available for Python [2]_.
Of these, mock is overwhelmingly the most popular, with as many
downloads on PyPI as the other mocking libraries combined.
An advantage of mock is that it is a mocking library and not a
framework. It provides a configurable and flexible mock object,
without being opinionated about how you write your tests. The
mock api is now well battle-tested and stable.
mock also handles safely monkeypatching and unmonkeypatching
objects during the scope of a test. This is hard to do safely
and many developers / projects mimic this functionality
(often incorrectly). A standardised way to do this, handling
the complexity of patching in the presence of the descriptor
protocol (etc) is useful. People are asking for a "patch" [3]_
feature to unittest. Doing this via mock.patch is preferable
to re-implementing part of this functionality in unittest.
Background
Addition of mock to the Python standard library was discussed
and agreed to at the Python Language Summit 2012.
References
[1] `mock library on PyPI<http://pypi.python.org/pypi/mock>`_
[2] http://pypi.python.org/pypi?%3Aaction=search&term=mock&submit=search
[3] http://bugs.python.org/issue11664
Copyright
This document has been placed in the public domain.
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil
sentence-end-double-space: t
fill-column: 70
coding: utf-8
End: