From 30e586693c2251e72ad86fa98cad9e418dd6910b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pradyun Gedam Date: Wed, 19 Apr 2023 14:25:07 -0600 Subject: [PATCH] PEP 704: Add a missing word in PEP withdrawal notice (#3111) --- pep-0704.rst | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pep-0704.rst b/pep-0704.rst index 937205d0c..a1607e307 100644 --- a/pep-0704.rst +++ b/pep-0704.rst @@ -20,7 +20,7 @@ This PEP recommends that package installers like ``pip`` require a virtual envi PEP Withdrawal ============== -During discussion of this PEP, it became clear that changes to pip's UX are not controlled by PEPs as proposed. It also became clear that a significant number of users rely on being able to mix managed-pip dependencies with managed-by-some-other-tool dependencies (most prominently, when using Conda). +During discussion of this PEP, it became clear that changes to pip's UX are not controlled by PEPs as proposed. It also became clear that a significant number of users rely on being able to mix managed-by-pip dependencies with managed-by-some-other-tool dependencies (most prominently, when using Conda). Further, a significant subset of the benefits of the proposed change are achievable via :pep:`668` (accepted and implemented at the time of writing). It provides redistributors of the Python interpreter control over whether users should be required to use a virtual environment, what the messaging presented to the user is and how the rollout of that change should happen for their users.