Convert pep-0042 to Rst

This commit is contained in:
Matthias Bussonnier 2016-06-22 11:40:40 -07:00
parent d0002d5e53
commit 483d4abd3d
1 changed files with 208 additions and 204 deletions

View File

@ -5,325 +5,329 @@ Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Jeremy Hylton <jeremy@alum.mit.edu>
Status: Final
Type: Process
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 12-Sep-2000
Post-History:
Introduction
============
This PEP contains a list of feature requests that may be
considered for future versions of Python. Large feature requests
should not be included here, but should be described in separate
PEPs; however a large feature request that doesn't have its own
PEP can be listed here until its own PEP is created. See
PEP 0 for details.
This PEP contains a list of feature requests that may be considered
for future versions of Python. Large feature requests should not be
included here, but should be described in separate PEPs; however a
large feature request that doesn't have its own PEP can be listed here
until its own PEP is created. See PEP 0 for details.
This PEP was created to allow us to close bug reports that are really
feature requests. Marked as Open, they distract from the list of real
bugs (which should ideally be less than a page). Marked as Closed, they
tend to be forgotten. The procedure now is: if a bug report is really
a feature request, add the feature request to this PEP; mark the bug as
"feature request", "later", and "closed"; and add a comment to the bug
saying that this is the case (mentioning the PEP explicitly). It is
also acceptable to move large feature requests directly from the bugs
database to a separate PEP.
This PEP was created to allow us to close bug reports that are really
feature requests. Marked as Open, they distract from the list of real
bugs (which should ideally be less than a page). Marked as Closed,
they tend to be forgotten. The procedure now is: if a bug report is
really a feature request, add the feature request to this PEP; mark
the bug as "feature request", "later", and "closed"; and add a comment
to the bug saying that this is the case (mentioning the PEP
explicitly). It is also acceptable to move large feature requests
directly from the bugs database to a separate PEP.
This PEP should really be separated into four different categories
(categories due to Laura Creighton):
This PEP should really be separated into four different categories
(categories due to Laura Creighton):
1. BDFL rejects as a bad idea. Don't come back with it.
1. BDFL rejects as a bad idea. Don't come back with it.
2. BDFL will put in if somebody writes the code. (Or at any rate,
BDFL will say 'change this and I will put it in' if you show up
with code.)
2. BDFL will put in if somebody writes the code. (Or at any rate,
BDFL will say 'change this and I will put it in' if you show up
with code.)
(possibly divided into:
possibly divided into:
2a) BDFL would really like to see some code!
a) BDFL would really like to see some code!
2b) BDFL is never going to be enthusiastic about this, but
will work it in when it's easy.
)
b) BDFL is never going to be enthusiastic about this, but
will work it in when it's easy.
3. If you show up with code, BDFL will make a pronouncement. It
might be ICK.
3. If you show up with code, BDFL will make a pronouncement. It might
be ICK.
4. This is too vague. This is rejected, but only on the grounds
of vagueness. If you like this enhancement, make a new PEP.
4. This is too vague. This is rejected, but only on the grounds of
vagueness. If you like this enhancement, make a new PEP.
Core Language / Builtins
========================
- The parser should handle more deeply nested parse trees.
* The parser should handle more deeply nested parse trees.
The following will fail -- eval("["*50 + "]"*50) -- because the
parser has a hard-coded limit on stack size. This limit should
be raised or removed. Removal would be hard because the
current compiler can overflow the C stack if the nesting is too
deep.
The following will fail -- ``eval("["*50`` + ``"]"*50)`` -- because
the parser has a hard-coded limit on stack size. This limit should
be raised or removed. Removal would be hard because the current
compiler can overflow the C stack if the nesting is too deep.
http://www.python.org/sf/215555
http://www.python.org/sf/215555
- Non-accidental IEEE-754 support (Infs, NaNs, settable traps, etc).
Big project.
* Non-accidental IEEE-754 support (Infs, NaNs, settable traps, etc).
Big project.
- Windows: Trying to create (or even access) files with certain magic
names can hang or crash Windows systems. This is really a bug in the
OSes, but some apps try to shield users from it. When it happens,
the symptoms are very confusing.
* Windows: Trying to create (or even access) files with certain
magic names can hang or crash Windows systems. This is really a
bug in the OSes, but some apps try to shield users from it. When
it happens, the symptoms are very confusing.
Hang using files named prn.txt, etc
http://www.python.org/sf/481171
Hang using files named prn.txt, etc http://www.python.org/sf/481171
- eval and free variables: It might be useful if there was a way
to pass bindings for free variables to eval when a code object
with free variables is passed.
http://www.python.org/sf/443866
* eval and free variables: It might be useful if there was a way to
pass bindings for free variables to eval when a code object with
free variables is passed. http://www.python.org/sf/443866
Standard Library
================
- The urllib module should support proxies which require
authentication. See SourceForge bug #210619 for information:
* The urllib module should support proxies which require
authentication. See SourceForge bug #210619 for information:
http://www.python.org/sf/210619
http://www.python.org/sf/210619
- os.rename() should be modified to handle EXDEV errors on
platforms that don't allow rename() to operate across filesystem
boundaries by copying the file over and removing the original.
Linux is one system that requires this treatment.
* os.rename() should be modified to handle EXDEV errors on platforms
that don't allow rename() to operate across filesystem boundaries
by copying the file over and removing the original. Linux is one
system that requires this treatment.
http://www.python.org/sf/212317
http://www.python.org/sf/212317
- signal handling doesn't always work as expected. E.g. if
sys.stdin.readline() is interrupted by a (returning) signal
handler, it returns "". It would be better to make it raise an
exception (corresponding to EINTR) or to restart. But these
changes would have to applied to all places that can do blocking
interruptable I/O. So it's a big project.
* signal handling doesn't always work as expected. E.g. if
sys.stdin.readline() is interrupted by a (returning) signal
handler, it returns "". It would be better to make it raise an
exception (corresponding to EINTR) or to restart. But these
changes would have to applied to all places that can do blocking
interruptable I/O. So it's a big project.
http://www.python.org/sf/210599
http://www.python.org/sf/210599
- Extend Windows utime to accept directory paths.
* Extend Windows utime to accept directory paths.
http://www.python.org/sf/214245
http://www.python.org/sf/214245
- Extend copy.py to module & function types.
* Extend copy.py to module & function types.
http://www.python.org/sf/214553
http://www.python.org/sf/214553
- Better checking for bad input to marshal.load*().
* Better checking for bad input to ``marshal.load*().``
http://www.python.org/sf/214754
http://www.python.org/sf/214754
- rfc822.py should be more lenient than the spec in the types of
address fields it parses. Specifically, an invalid address of
the form "From: Amazon.com <delivers-news2@amazon.com>" should
be parsed correctly.
* rfc822.py should be more lenient than the spec in the types of
address fields it parses. Specifically, an invalid address of the
form "From: Amazon.com <delivers-news2@amazon.com>" should be
parsed correctly.
http://www.python.org/sf/210678
http://www.python.org/sf/210678
- cgi.py's FieldStorage class should be more conservative with
memory in the face of large binary file uploads.
* cgi.py's FieldStorage class should be more conservative with memory
in the face of large binary file uploads.
http://www.python.org/sf/210674
http://www.python.org/sf/210674
There are two issues here: first, because
read_lines_to_outerboundary() uses readline() it is possible
that a large amount of data will be read into memory for a
binary file upload. This should probably look at the
Content-Type header of the section and do a chunked read if it's
a binary type.
There are two issues here: first, because
read_lines_to_outerboundary() uses readline() it is possible that a
large amount of data will be read into memory for a binary file
upload. This should probably look at the Content-Type header of the
section and do a chunked read if it's a binary type.
The second issue was related to the self.lines attribute, which
was removed in revision 1.56 of cgi.py (see also):
The second issue was related to the self.lines attribute, which was
removed in revision 1.56 of cgi.py (see also):
http://www.python.org/sf/219806
http://www.python.org/sf/219806
- urllib should support proxy definitions that contain just the
host and port
* urllib should support proxy definitions that contain just the host
and port
http://www.python.org/sf/210849
http://www.python.org/sf/210849
- urlparse should be updated to comply with RFC 2396, which
defines optional parameters for each segment of the path.
* urlparse should be updated to comply with RFC 2396, which defines
optional parameters for each segment of the path.
http://www.python.org/sf/210834
http://www.python.org/sf/210834
- The exceptions raised by pickle and cPickle are currently
different; these should be unified (probably the exceptions
should be defined in a helper module that's imported by both).
[No bug report; I just thought of this.]
* The exceptions raised by pickle and cPickle are currently
different; these should be unified (probably the exceptions should
be defined in a helper module that's imported by both). [No bug
report; I just thought of this.]
- More standard library routines should support Unicode. For
example, urllib.quote() could convert Unicode strings to UTF-8
and then do the usual %HH conversion. But this is not the only
one!
* More standard library routines should support Unicode. For
example, urllib.quote() could convert Unicode strings to UTF-8 and
then do the usual %HH conversion. But this is not the only one!
http://www.python.org/sf/216716
http://www.python.org/sf/216716
- There should be a way to say that you don't mind if str() or
__str__() return a Unicode string object. Or a different
function -- ustr() has been proposed. Or something...
* There should be a way to say that you don't mind if ``str()`` or
``__str__()`` return a Unicode string object. Or a different function
-- ``ustr()`` has been proposed. Or something...
http://sf.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=101527&group_id=5470
http://sf.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=101527&group_id=5470
- Killing a thread from another thread. Or maybe sending a
signal. Or maybe raising an asynchronous exception.
* Killing a thread from another thread. Or maybe sending a signal.
Or maybe raising an asynchronous exception.
http://www.python.org/sf/221115
http://www.python.org/sf/221115
- The debugger (pdb) should understand packages.
* The debugger (pdb) should understand packages.
http://www.python.org/sf/210631
http://www.python.org/sf/210631
- Jim Fulton suggested the following:
* Jim Fulton suggested the following:
I wonder if it would be a good idea to have a new kind of
temporary file that stored data in memory unless:
::
- The data exceeds some size, or
I wonder if it would be a good idea to have a new kind of
temporary file that stored data in memory unless:
- Somebody asks for a fileno.
- The data exceeds some size, or
Then the cgi module (and other apps) could use this thing in a
uniform way.
- Somebody asks for a fileno.
http://www.python.org/sf/415692
Then the cgi module (and other apps) could use this thing in a
uniform way.
- Jim Fulton pointed out that binascii's b2a_base64() function
has situations where it makes sense not to append a newline,
or to append something else than a newline.
http://www.python.org/sf/415692
Proposal:
* Jim Fulton pointed out that binascii's b2a_base64() function has
situations where it makes sense not to append a newline, or to
append something else than a newline.
- add an optional argument giving the delimiter string to be
appended, defaulting to "\n"
Proposal:
- possibly special-case None as the delimiter string to avoid
adding the pad bytes too???
- add an optional argument giving the delimiter string to be
appended, defaulting to "\\n"
http://www.python.org/sf/415694
- possibly special-case None as the delimiter string to avoid adding
the pad bytes too???
- pydoc should be integrated with the HTML docs, or at least
be able to link to them.
http://www.python.org/sf/415694
http://www.python.org/sf/405554
* pydoc should be integrated with the HTML docs, or at least be able
to link to them.
- Distutils should deduce dependencies for .c and .h files.
http://www.python.org/sf/405554
http://www.python.org/sf/472881
* Distutils should deduce dependencies for .c and .h files.
- asynchat is buggy in the face of multithreading.
http://www.python.org/sf/472881
http://www.python.org/sf/595217
* asynchat is buggy in the face of multithreading.
- It would be nice if the higher level modules (httplib, smtplib,
nntplib, etc.) had options for setting socket timeouts.
http://www.python.org/sf/595217
http://www.python.org/sf/723287
* It would be nice if the higher level modules (httplib, smtplib,
nntplib, etc.) had options for setting socket timeouts.
- The curses library is missing two important calls: newterm() and
delscreen()
http://www.python.org/sf/723287
http://www.python.org/sf/665572, http://bugs.debian.org/175590
* The curses library is missing two important calls: newterm() and
delscreen()
- It would be nice if the built-in SSL socket type could be used
for non-blocking SSL I/O. Currently packages such as Twisted
which implement async servers using SSL have to require third-party
packages such as pyopenssl.
http://www.python.org/sf/665572, http://bugs.debian.org/175590
- reST as a standard library module
* It would be nice if the built-in SSL socket type could be used for
non-blocking SSL I/O. Currently packages such as Twisted which
implement async servers using SSL have to require third-party
packages such as pyopenssl.
- The import lock could use some redesign.
http://www.python.org/sf/683658
* reST as a standard library module
- A nicer API to open text files, replacing the ugly (in some
people's eyes) "U" mode flag. There's a proposal out there to
have a new built-in type textfile(filename, mode, encoding).
(Shouldn't it have a bufsize argument too?)
* The import lock could use some redesign.
- Support new widgets and/or parameters for Tkinter
http://www.python.org/sf/683658
- For a class defined inside another class, the __name__ should be
"outer.inner", and pickling should work. (GvR is no longer certain
this is easy or even right.)
* A nicer API to open text files, replacing the ugly (in some
people's eyes) "U" mode flag. There's a proposal out there to have
a new built-in type textfile(filename, mode, encoding). (Shouldn't
it have a bufsize argument too?)
http://www.python.org/sf/633930
* Support new widgets and/or parameters for Tkinter
- Decide on a clearer deprecation policy (especially for modules)
and act on it.
* For a class defined inside another class, the __name__ should be
"outer.inner", and pickling should work. (GvR is no longer certain
this is easy or even right.)
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-April/023165.html
http://www.python.org/sf/633930
- Provide alternatives for common uses of the types module;
Skip Montanaro has posted a proto-PEP for this idea:
* Decide on a clearer deprecation policy (especially for modules) and
act on it.
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-May/024346.html
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-April/023165.html
- Use pending deprecation for the types and string modules. This
requires providing alternatives for the parts that aren't
covered yet (e.g. string.whitespace and types.TracebackType).
It seems we can't get consensus on this.
* Provide alternatives for common uses of the types module; Skip
Montanaro has posted a proto-PEP for this idea:
- Lazily tracking tuples?
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-May/024346.html
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-May/023926.html
http://www.python.org/sf/558745
* Use pending deprecation for the types and string modules. This
requires providing alternatives for the parts that aren't covered
yet (e.g. string.whitespace and types.TracebackType). It seems we
can't get consensus on this.
- Make 'as' a keyword. It has been a pseudo-keyword long enough.
(It's deprecated in 2.5, and will become a keyword in 2.6.)
* Lazily tracking tuples?
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-May/023926.html
http://www.python.org/sf/558745
* Make 'as' a keyword. It has been a pseudo-keyword long enough.
(It's deprecated in 2.5, and will become a keyword in 2.6.)
C API wishes
============
- Add C API functions to help Windows users who are building
embedded applications where the FILE * structure does not match
the FILE * the interpreter was compiled with.
* Add C API functions to help Windows users who are building embedded
applications where the FILE \* structure does not match the FILE \*
the interpreter was compiled with.
http://www.python.org/sf/210821
http://www.python.org/sf/210821
See this bug report for a specific suggestion that will allow a
Borland C++ builder application to interact with a python.dll
build with MSVC.
See this bug report for a specific suggestion that will allow a
Borland C++ builder application to interact with a python.dll build
with MSVC.
Tools
=====
- Python could use a GUI builder.
* Python could use a GUI builder.
http://www.python.org/sf/210820
http://www.python.org/sf/210820
Building and Installing
=======================
- Modules/makesetup should make sure the 'config.c' file it
generates from the various Setup files, is valid C. It currently
accepts module names with characters that are not allowable in
Python or C identifiers.
* Modules/makesetup should make sure the 'config.c' file it generates
from the various Setup files, is valid C. It currently accepts
module names with characters that are not allowable in Python or C
identifiers.
http://www.python.org/sf/216326
http://www.python.org/sf/216326
- Building from source should not attempt to overwrite the
Include/graminit.h and Parser/graminit.c files, at least for
people downloading a source release rather than working from
Subversion or snapshots. Some people find this a problem in unusual
build environments.
* Building from source should not attempt to overwrite the
Include/graminit.h and Parser/graminit.c files, at least for people
downloading a source release rather than working from Subversion or
snapshots. Some people find this a problem in unusual build
environments.
http://www.python.org/sf/219221
http://www.python.org/sf/219221
- The configure script has probably grown a bit crufty with age and may
not track autoconf's more recent features very well. It should be
looked at and possibly cleaned up.
* The configure script has probably grown a bit crufty with age and
may not track autoconf's more recent features very well. It should
be looked at and possibly cleaned up.
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/041790.html
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-January/041790.html
- Make Python compliant to the FHS (the Filesystem Hierarchy Standard)
* Make Python compliant to the FHS (the Filesystem Hierarchy
Standard)
http://bugs.python.org/issue588756
http://bugs.python.org/issue588756
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil
End:
..
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil
End: