PEP 536: Mark as Withdrawn (#3510)

Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>

peps/pep-0536.rst

@@ -3,12 +3,15 @@ Title: Final Grammar for Literal String Interpolation
 Version: $Revision$
 Last-Modified: $Date$
 Author: Philipp Angerer <phil.angerer@gmail.com>
-Status: Deferred
+Status: Withdrawn
 Type: Standards Track
 Content-Type: text/x-rst
 Created: 11-Dec-2016
 Python-Version: 3.7
-Post-History: 12-Dec-2016
+Post-History: `18-Aug-2016 <https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/thread/FOYKXOFWEINPVQSK2XGEHKXSTEVO5WWA/>`__,
+              `23-Dec-2016 <https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-ideas@python.org/thread/YKKEA5NIMMKHZTMRE5UFHST4WQ4NN3XJ/>`__,
+              `15-Mar-2019 <https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/thread/N43O4KNLZW4U7YZC4NVPCETZIVRDUVU2/>`__
+Resolution: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-536-should-be-marked-as-rejected/35226/4
 
 Abstract
 ========
@@ -21,10 +24,11 @@ those restrictions, promoting “f-strings” to “f expressions” or f-litera
 This PEP expands upon the f-strings introduced by :pep:`498`,
 so this text requires familiarity with :pep:`498`.
 
-PEP Status
-==========
+PEP Withdrawal
+==============
 
-This PEP is deferred until an implementation is available.
+This PEP has been withdrawn in favour of :pep:`701`.
+:pep:`701` addresses all important points of this PEP.
 
 
 Terminology