Bug fix in implementation sketch, and some implementation open issues.
This commit is contained in:
parent
a428d1bf4a
commit
5180c4f5cf
|
@ -78,10 +78,10 @@ Implementation
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
union {
|
union {
|
||||||
long i;
|
long i;
|
||||||
struct bignum {
|
struct {
|
||||||
unsigned long length;
|
unsigned long length;
|
||||||
digit digits[1];
|
digit digits[1];
|
||||||
}
|
} bignum;
|
||||||
};
|
};
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Only the n-1 lower bits of the long have any meaning; the top bit
|
Only the n-1 lower bits of the long have any meaning; the top bit
|
||||||
|
@ -108,6 +108,9 @@ Open Issues
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Should the overflow warning be on a portable maximum size?
|
Should the overflow warning be on a portable maximum size?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Will unification of types and classes help with a more straightforward
|
||||||
|
implementations?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Copyright
|
Copyright
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue