* Add Holger's new, well-received idea.

* Fixed typo.

pep-0308.txt

@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@ Proposal
 
 	(if <condition>: <expression1> else: <expression2>) 
 
-    Note that the enclosing parethesis are not optional.
+    Note that the enclosing parentheses are not optional.
     
     The resulting expression is evaluated like this:
 
@@ -83,6 +83,19 @@ Alternatives
 
     ---
 
+    Holger Krekel proposed a new, minimally invasive variant:
+
+        <expression1> and <condition> else <expression2>
+
+    The concept behind it is that a nearly complete ternary operator
+    already exists with and/or and this proposal is the least invasive
+    change that makes it complete.  Many respondants on the
+    newsgroup found this to be the most pleasing alternative.
+    However, a couple of respondants were able to post examples
+    that were mentally difficult to parse.
+
+    ---
+
     Many C-derived languages use this syntax:
 
         <condition> ? <expression1> : <expression2>