some notes about test cases

couple of more small action items

pep-0200.txt

@@ -83,9 +83,15 @@ Failing test cases need to get fixed
     anyway, but that's another matter.)  If the test cases are known
     to fail, they serve no useful purpose.
 
-    The current test suite runs correctly on my Linux box (July 26).
-    Heard reports that test_fork1 fails on some Linux boxes and that
-    test_winreg and test_winreg32 fail on Windows.
+    test case         platform   R B    date reported   note
+    test_mmap          Win32     X X    July 26, 2000
+        [believe that was fixed by Mark H.]
+    test_winreg        Win32     X X    July 26, 2000
+    test_winreg2       Win32     X X    July 26, 2000
+    test_popen2        Win32     X X    July 26, 2000   skipped
+        [believe this was fix by /F]
+    test_fork1         Linux     X      July 26, 2000   just SMP?  
+        [no clue; there are probably two bugs here]
   
 Open items -- should be done/fixed
 
@@ -129,6 +135,12 @@ Accepted and in progress
 
 Open: proposed but not accepted or declined
 
+    * Fix xrange printing behavior
+
+    * Tim O'Malley's cookie module -- but need different license
+
+    * test harness for C code - Trent Mick
+
     * List comprehensions - Tim Peters?
       Need a coherent proposal.  Lots of confusing discussion going
       on.