diff --git a/pep-0280.txt b/pep-0280.txt
index 94bbcbe37..ee60cfe46 100644
--- a/pep-0280.txt
+++ b/pep-0280.txt
@@ -2,7 +2,7 @@ PEP: 280
 Title: Optimizing access to globals
 Version: $Revision$
 Last-Modified: $Date$
-Author: skip@pobox.com, jeremy@alum.mit.edu, guido@python.org, tim.one@comcast.net, 
+Author: guido@python.org (Guido van Rossum)
 Status: Draft
 Type: Standards Track
 Created: 10-Feb-2002
@@ -12,34 +12,17 @@ Post-History:
 
 Abstract
 
-    This PEP attempts to summarize various approaches for avoiding the
-    dictionary lookup for accessing globals and built-ins in most
-    cases.  There are several competing approaches, which originated
-    in historical order by authors Montanaro, Hylton, and Van Rossum.
-    The fourth author is added for his valuable feedback during all
-    stages.
+    This PEP describes yet another approach to optimizing access to
+    module globals, providing an alternative to PEP 266 (Optimizing
+    Global Variable/Attribute Access by Skip Montanaro) and PEP 267
+    (Optimized Access to Module Namespaces by Jeremy Hylton).
 
     The expectation is that eventually one approach will be picked and
     implemented; possibly multiple approaches will be prototyped
     first.
 
 
-Montanaro's approach: tracking globals
-
-    XXX (Skip, please check in a description!).
-
-
-Hylton's approach: using a dlict
-
-    XXX (Jerely, please check in a description!)
-
-    See Jeremy's Python10 DevDay slides at
-    http://www.python.org/~jeremy/talks/spam10/PEP-267-1.html
-    and his Wiki at
-    http://www.zope.org/Members/jeremy/CurrentAndFutureProjects/FastGlobals
-
-
-Van Rossum's approach: using a celldict
+Description
 
     (Note: Jason Orendorff writes: """I implemented this once, long
     ago, for Python 1.5-ish, I believe.  I got it to the point where
@@ -226,4 +209,4 @@ Van Rossum's approach: using a celldict
 
 Comparison
 
-    XXX Here, a comparison of the three approaches should be added.
+    XXX Here, a comparison of the three approaches could be added.