Typo (has_keys -> has_key), found by F.Pinard.
This commit is contained in:
parent
b26cc7ccc7
commit
664cf2aec9
|
@ -311,7 +311,7 @@ Resolved Issues
|
|||
because they are derived from an abstract mapping type.
|
||||
|
||||
- Regarding "if key in dict": there is no doubt that the
|
||||
dict.has_keys(x) interpretation of "x in dict" is by far the
|
||||
dict.has_key(x) interpretation of "x in dict" is by far the
|
||||
most useful interpretation, probably the only useful one. There
|
||||
has been resistance against this because "x in list" checks
|
||||
whether x is present among the values, while the proposal makes
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue