From 69c9d49284804cf29399ce369c03d09d183a44d6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Skip Montanaro Date: Tue, 10 Aug 2004 01:51:30 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] minor corrections --- pep-0318.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/pep-0318.txt b/pep-0318.txt index e68c23a41..2e2f0cbe4 100644 --- a/pep-0318.txt +++ b/pep-0318.txt @@ -106,7 +106,7 @@ including `this piece`_ on the various rejected forms. http://www.python.org/doc/essays/ppt/euro2004/euro2004.pdf .. _outlined his case: - http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/authors.html + http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/author.html .. _this piece: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2004-August/046672.html @@ -247,7 +247,7 @@ class with and without decorators would be a readability problem. Finally, adding or removing decorators would require reindenting the entire function/method body. -Guido proposed and implementated a patch to support interpretation of +Guido proposed and implemented a patch to support interpretation of a `list of decorators`_ as a prefix to function definitions :: [dec1, dec2, ...]