PEP 639: Update PEP delegate, post history and CODEOWNERS (GH-2228)
This commit is contained in:
parent
d9e63ccf42
commit
6c7fa9746f
|
@ -507,7 +507,7 @@ pep-0635.rst @brandtbucher @gvanrossum
|
||||||
pep-0636.rst @brandtbucher @gvanrossum
|
pep-0636.rst @brandtbucher @gvanrossum
|
||||||
pep-0637.rst @stevendaprano
|
pep-0637.rst @stevendaprano
|
||||||
pep-0638.rst @markshannon
|
pep-0638.rst @markshannon
|
||||||
pep-0639.rst @pfmoore
|
pep-0639.rst @pfmoore @CAM-Gerlach
|
||||||
pep-0640.rst @Yhg1s
|
pep-0640.rst @Yhg1s
|
||||||
pep-0641.rst @zooba @warsaw @brettcannon
|
pep-0641.rst @zooba @warsaw @brettcannon
|
||||||
pep-0642.rst @ncoghlan
|
pep-0642.rst @ncoghlan
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -5,13 +5,13 @@ Last-Modified: $Date$
|
||||||
Author: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne at nexb.com>,
|
Author: Philippe Ombredanne <pombredanne at nexb.com>,
|
||||||
C.A.M. Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach at Gerlach.CAM>
|
C.A.M. Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach at Gerlach.CAM>
|
||||||
Sponsor: Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com>
|
Sponsor: Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com>
|
||||||
PEP-Delegate: Paul Moore <p.f.moore at gmail.com>
|
PEP-Delegate: Brett Cannon <brett at python.org>
|
||||||
Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/12622
|
Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/12622
|
||||||
Status: Draft
|
Status: Draft
|
||||||
Type: Standards Track
|
Type: Standards Track
|
||||||
Content-Type: text/x-rst
|
Content-Type: text/x-rst
|
||||||
Created: 15-Aug-2019
|
Created: 15-Aug-2019
|
||||||
Post-History:
|
Post-History: 15-Aug-2019, 17-Dec-2021
|
||||||
Resolution:
|
Resolution:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
@ -1396,7 +1396,7 @@ but re-using the ``license`` key for the license expression, either by
|
||||||
defining it as the (previously reserved) string value for the ``license``
|
defining it as the (previously reserved) string value for the ``license``
|
||||||
key, retaining the ``expression`` subkey in the ``license`` table, or
|
key, retaining the ``expression`` subkey in the ``license`` table, or
|
||||||
allowing both. Indeed, this would seem to have been envisioned by PEP 621
|
allowing both. Indeed, this would seem to have been envisioned by PEP 621
|
||||||
itself with this PEP in mind, in particular the first approach::
|
itself with this PEP in mind, in particular the first approach:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A practical string value for the license key has been purposefully left
|
A practical string value for the license key has been purposefully left
|
||||||
out to allow for a future PEP to specify support for SPDX expressions
|
out to allow for a future PEP to specify support for SPDX expressions
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue