Offer the community a choice for a simpler, limited alternative.

pep-0322.txt

@@ -153,6 +153,16 @@ library and comments on why reverse iteration was necessary:
   underlying list is altered during iteration.
 
 
+Active Alternative
+==================
+
+A simpler, but limited alternative is to create a builtin called
+reverse_range() that takes the same arguments as range() but returns a
+reverse iterator over the range.  The idea is that much of the benefit
+of inreverse() comes reducing the intellectual effort it takes to
+express the arguments for [x]range() when going backwards.
+
+
 Rejected Alternative
 ====================