Clarify that the PEP intent is not to serve as an
internationalization tool or to accommodate every possible convention. It intends to provide a generally useful tool for improving readability in many contexts. Also, clarify the groupings are for the integer part of a number. Digits to the right of the decimal point are unchanged.
This commit is contained in:
parent
dc3abfc0d3
commit
74e39f49b6
29
pep-0378.txt
29
pep-0378.txt
|
@ -35,7 +35,8 @@ in detail.
|
|||
|
||||
.. _`many other challenges`: http://docs.python.org/library/locale.html#background-details-hints-tips-and-caveats
|
||||
|
||||
It is not the goal to replace the locale module or to
|
||||
It is not the goal to replace the locale module, to perform
|
||||
internationalization takes, or
|
||||
accommodate every possible convention. Such tasks are better
|
||||
suited to robust tools like `Babel`_ . Instead, our goal is to
|
||||
make a common, everyday task easier for many users.
|
||||
|
@ -59,12 +60,6 @@ Research so far
|
|||
Scanning the web, I've found that thousands separators are
|
||||
usually one of COMMA, DOT, SPACE, APOSTROPHE or UNDERSCORE.
|
||||
|
||||
James Knight observed that Indian/Pakistani numbering systems
|
||||
group by hundreds. Ben Finney noted that Chinese group by
|
||||
ten-thousands. Eric Smith pointed-out that these are already
|
||||
handled by the "n" specifier in the locale module (albeit only
|
||||
for integers).
|
||||
|
||||
Visual Basic and its brethren (like `MS Excel`_) use a completely
|
||||
different style and have ultra-flexible custom format
|
||||
specifiers like::
|
||||
|
@ -158,7 +153,10 @@ Examples::
|
|||
format(1234, "8_d") --> ' 1_234'
|
||||
|
||||
This proposal meets mosts needs, but it comes at the expense
|
||||
of being a little more complicated to learn and remember.
|
||||
of taking a bit more effort to parse. Not every possible
|
||||
convention is covered, but at least one of the options (spaces
|
||||
or underscores) should be readable, understandable, and useful
|
||||
to folks from many diverse backgrounds.
|
||||
|
||||
As shown in the examples, the *width* argument means the total
|
||||
length including the thousands separators and decimal separators.
|
||||
|
@ -220,6 +218,21 @@ Commentary
|
|||
is to set the convention once and have it apply everywhere (others
|
||||
commented that locale already provides a way to do this).
|
||||
|
||||
* There are some precedents for grouping digits in the fractional
|
||||
part of a floating point number, but this PEP does not venture into
|
||||
that territory. Only digits to the left of the decimal point are
|
||||
grouped. This does not preclude future extensions; it just focuses
|
||||
on a single, generally useful extension to the formatting language.
|
||||
|
||||
* James Knight observed that Indian/Pakistani numbering systems
|
||||
group by hundreds. Ben Finney noted that Chinese group by
|
||||
ten-thousands. Eric Smith pointed-out that these are already
|
||||
handled by the "n" specifier in the locale module (albeit only
|
||||
for integers). This PEP does not attempt to support all of those
|
||||
possibilities. It focuees on a single, relatively common grouping
|
||||
convention that offers a quick way to improve readability in many
|
||||
(though not all) contexts.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright
|
||||
=========
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue