iSharkFly-Open
/
python-peps
mirror of https://github.com/python/peps.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

reSTify PEP 280 (#318)

This commit is contained in:
Huang Huang 2017-08-12 02:47:47 +08:00 committed by Brett Cannon
parent 7f68262609
commit 75b53a7813
1 changed files with 413 additions and 401 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

814
pep-0280.txt
View File

@ -5,522 +5,534 @@ Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: guido@python.org (Guido van Rossum)
Status: Deferred
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 10-Feb-2002
Python-Version: 2.3
Post-History:
Deferral
========
While this PEP is a nice idea, no-one has yet emerged to do the work of
hashing out the differences between this PEP, PEP 266 and PEP 267.
Hence, it is being deferred.
While this PEP is a nice idea, no-one has yet emerged to do the work of
hashing out the differences between this PEP, PEP 266 and PEP 267.
Hence, it is being deferred.
Abstract
========
This PEP describes yet another approach to optimizing access to
module globals, providing an alternative to PEP 266 (Optimizing
Global Variable/Attribute Access by Skip Montanaro) and PEP 267
(Optimized Access to Module Namespaces by Jeremy Hylton).
This PEP describes yet another approach to optimizing access to
module globals, providing an alternative to PEP 266 (Optimizing
Global Variable/Attribute Access by Skip Montanaro) and PEP 267
(Optimized Access to Module Namespaces by Jeremy Hylton).
The expectation is that eventually one approach will be picked and
implemented; possibly multiple approaches will be prototyped
first.
The expectation is that eventually one approach will be picked and
implemented; possibly multiple approaches will be prototyped
first.
Description
===========
(Note: Jason Orendorff writes: """I implemented this once, long
ago, for Python 1.5-ish, I believe. I got it to the point where
it was only 15% slower than ordinary Python, then abandoned it.
;) In my implementation, "cells" were real first-class objects,
and "celldict" was a copy-and-hack version of dictionary. I
forget how the rest worked.""" Reference:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-February/019876.html)
(Note: Jason Orendorff writes: """I implemented this once, long
ago, for Python 1.5-ish, I believe. I got it to the point where
it was only 15% slower than ordinary Python, then abandoned it.
;) In my implementation, "cells" were real first-class objects,
and "celldict" was a copy-and-hack version of dictionary. I
forget how the rest worked.""" Reference:
https://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2002-February/019876.html)
Let a cell be a really simple Python object, containing a pointer
to a Python object and a pointer to a cell. Both pointers may be
NULL. A Python implementation could be:
Let a cell be a really simple Python object, containing a pointer
to a Python object and a pointer to a cell. Both pointers may be
``NULL``. A Python implementation could be::
class cell(object):
class cell(object):
def __init__(self):
self.objptr = NULL
self.cellptr = NULL
def __init__(self):
self.objptr = NULL
self.cellptr = NULL
The cellptr attribute is used for chaining cells together for
searching built-ins; this will be explained later.
The cellptr attribute is used for chaining cells together for
searching built-ins; this will be explained later.
Let a celldict be a mapping from strings (the names of a module's
globals) to objects (the values of those globals), implemented
using a dict of cells. A Python implementation could be:
Let a celldict be a mapping from strings (the names of a module's
globals) to objects (the values of those globals), implemented
using a dict of cells. A Python implementation could be::
class celldict(object):
class celldict(object):
def __init__(self):
self.__dict = {} # dict of cells
def __init__(self):
self.__dict = {} # dict of cells
def getcell(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None:
c = cell()
self.__dict[key] = c
return c
def getcell(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None:
c = cell()
self.__dict[key] = c
return c
def cellkeys(self):
return self.__dict.keys()
def cellkeys(self):
return self.__dict.keys()
def __getitem__(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None:
raise KeyError, key
value = c.objptr
if value is NULL:
raise KeyError, key
else:
return value
def __getitem__(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None:
raise KeyError, key
value = c.objptr
if value is NULL:
raise KeyError, key
else:
return value
def __setitem__(self, key, value):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None:
c = cell()
self.__dict[key] = c
c.objptr = value
def __setitem__(self, key, value):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None:
c = cell()
self.__dict[key] = c
c.objptr = value
def __delitem__(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None or c.objptr is NULL:
raise KeyError, key
def __delitem__(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None or c.objptr is NULL:
raise KeyError, key
c.objptr = NULL
def keys(self):
return [k for k, c in self.__dict.iteritems()
if c.objptr is not NULL]
def items(self):
return [k, c.objptr for k, c in self.__dict.iteritems()
if c.objptr is not NULL]
def values(self):
preturn [c.objptr for c in self.__dict.itervalues()
if c.objptr is not NULL]
def clear(self):
for c in self.__dict.values():
c.objptr = NULL
def keys(self):
return [k for k, c in self.__dict.iteritems()
if c.objptr is not NULL]
# Etc.
def items(self):
return [k, c.objptr for k, c in self.__dict.iteritems()
if c.objptr is not NULL]
It is possible that a cell exists corresponding to a given key,
but the cell's objptr is ``NULL``; let's call such a cell empty. When
the celldict is used as a mapping, it is as if empty cells don't
exist. However, once added, a cell is never deleted from a
celldict, and it is possible to get at empty cells using the
``getcell()`` method.
def values(self):
preturn [c.objptr for c in self.__dict.itervalues()
if c.objptr is not NULL]
The celldict implementation never uses the cellptr attribute of
cells.
def clear(self):
for c in self.__dict.values():
c.objptr = NULL
We change the module implementation to use a celldict for its
``__dict__``. The module's getattr, setattr and delattr operations
now map to getitem, setitem and delitem on the celldict. The type
of ``<module>.__dict__`` and ``globals()`` is probably the only backwards
incompatibility.
# Etc.
When a module is initialized, its ``__builtins__`` is initialized from
the ``__builtin__`` module's ``__dict__``, which is itself a celldict.
For each cell in ``__builtins__``, the new module's ``__dict__`` adds a
cell with a ``NULL`` objptr, whose cellptr points to the corresponding
cell of ``__builtins__``. Python pseudo-code (ignoring rexec)::
It is possible that a cell exists corresponding to a given key,
but the cell's objptr is NULL; let's call such a cell empty. When
the celldict is used as a mapping, it is as if empty cells don't
exist. However, once added, a cell is never deleted from a
celldict, and it is possible to get at empty cells using the
getcell() method.
import __builtin__
The celldict implementation never uses the cellptr attribute of
cells.
class module(object):
We change the module implementation to use a celldict for its
__dict__. The module's getattr, setattr and delattr operations
now map to getitem, setitem and delitem on the celldict. The type
of <module>.__dict__ and globals() is probably the only backwards
incompatibility.
def __init__(self):
self.__dict__ = d = celldict()
d['__builtins__'] = bd = __builtin__.__dict__
for k in bd.cellkeys():
c = self.__dict__.getcell(k)
c.cellptr = bd.getcell(k)
When a module is initialized, its __builtins__ is initialized from
the __builtin__ module's __dict__, which is itself a celldict.
For each cell in __builtins__, the new module's __dict__ adds a
cell with a NULL objptr, whose cellptr points to the corresponding
cell of __builtins__. Python pseudo-code (ignoring rexec):
def __getattr__(self, k):
try:
return self.__dict__[k]
except KeyError:
raise IndexError, k
import __builtin__
def __setattr__(self, k, v):
self.__dict__[k] = v
class module(object):
def __delattr__(self, k):
del self.__dict__[k]
def __init__(self):
self.__dict__ = d = celldict()
d['__builtins__'] = bd = __builtin__.__dict__
for k in bd.cellkeys():
c = self.__dict__.getcell(k)
c.cellptr = bd.getcell(k)
The compiler generates ``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL <i>`` (and ``STORE_GLOBAL_CELL
<i>`` etc.) opcodes for references to globals, where ``<i>`` is a small
index with meaning only within one code object like the const
index in ``LOAD_CONST``. The code object has a new tuple, ``co_globals``,
giving the names of the globals referenced by the code indexed by
``<i>``. No new analysis is required to be able to do this.
def __getattr__(self, k):
try:
return self.__dict__[k]
except KeyError:
raise IndexError, k
When a function object is created from a code object and a celldict,
the function object creates an array of cell pointers by asking the
celldict for cells corresponding to the names in the code object's
``co_globals``. If the celldict doesn't already have a cell for a
particular name, it creates and an empty one. This array of cell
pointers is stored on the function object as ``func_cells``. When a
function object is created from a regular dict instead of a
celldict, ``func_cells`` is a ``NULL`` pointer.
def __setattr__(self, k, v):
self.__dict__[k] = v
When the VM executes a ``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL <i>`` instruction, it gets
cell number ``<i>`` from ``func_cells``. It then looks in the cell's
``PyObject`` pointer, and if not ``NULL``, that's the global value. If it
is ``NULL``, it follows the cell's cell pointer to the next cell, if it
is not ``NULL``, and looks in the ``PyObject`` pointer in that cell. If
that's also ``NULL``, or if there is no second cell, ``NameError`` is
raised. (It could follow the chain of cell pointers until a ``NULL``
cell pointer is found; but I have no use for this.) Similar for
``STORE_GLOBAL_CELL <i>``, except it doesn't follow the cell pointer
chain -- it always stores in the first cell.
def __delattr__(self, k):
del self.__dict__[k]
The compiler generates LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL <i> (and STORE_GLOBAL_CELL
<i> etc.) opcodes for references to globals, where <i> is a small
index with meaning only within one code object like the const
index in LOAD_CONST. The code object has a new tuple, co_globals,
giving the names of the globals referenced by the code indexed by
<i>. No new analysis is required to be able to do this.
When a function object is created from a code object and a celldict,
the function object creates an array of cell pointers by asking the
celldict for cells corresponding to the names in the code object's
co_globals. If the celldict doesn't already have a cell for a
particular name, it creates and an empty one. This array of cell
pointers is stored on the function object as func_cells. When a
function object is created from a regular dict instead of a
celldict, func_cells is a NULL pointer.
When the VM executes a LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL <i> instruction, it gets
cell number <i> from func_cells. It then looks in the cell's
PyObject pointer, and if not NULL, that's the global value. If it
is NULL, it follows the cell's cell pointer to the next cell, if it
is not NULL, and looks in the PyObject pointer in that cell. If
that's also NULL, or if there is no second cell, NameError is
raised. (It could follow the chain of cell pointers until a NULL
cell pointer is found; but I have no use for this.) Similar for
STORE_GLOBAL_CELL <i>, except it doesn't follow the cell pointer
chain -- it always stores in the first cell.
There are fallbacks in the VM for the case where the function's
globals aren't a celldict, and hence func_cells is NULL. In that
case, the code object's co_globals is indexed with <i> to find the
name of the corresponding global and this name is used to index the
function's globals dict.
There are fallbacks in the VM for the case where the function's
globals aren't a celldict, and hence ``func_cells`` is ``NULL``. In that
case, the code object's ``co_globals`` is indexed with ``<i>`` to find the
name of the corresponding global and this name is used to index the
function's globals dict.
Additional Ideas
================
- Never make func_cell a NULL pointer; instead, make up an array
of empty cells, so that LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL can index func_cells
without a NULL check.
- Never make ``func_cell`` a ``NULL`` pointer; instead, make up an array
of empty cells, so that ``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL`` can index ``func_cells``
without a ``NULL`` check.
- Make c.cellptr equal to c when a cell is created, so that
LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL can always dereference c.cellptr without a NULL
check.
- Make ``c.cellptr`` equal to c when a cell is created, so that
``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL`` can always dereference ``c.cellptr`` without a ``NULL``
check.
With these two additional ideas added, here's Python pseudo-code
for LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL:
With these two additional ideas added, here's Python pseudo-code
for ``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL``::
def LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL(self, i):
# self is the frame
c = self.func_cells[i]
obj = c.objptr
if obj is not NULL:
return obj # Existing global
return c.cellptr.objptr # Built-in or NULL
def LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL(self, i):
# self is the frame
c = self.func_cells[i]
obj = c.objptr
if obj is not NULL:
return obj # Existing global
return c.cellptr.objptr # Built-in or NULL
- Be more aggressive: put the actual values of builtins into module
dicts, not just pointers to cells containing the actual values.
- Be more aggressive: put the actual values of builtins into module
dicts, not just pointers to cells containing the actual values.
There are two points to this: (1) Simplify and speed access, which
is the most common operation. (2) Support faithful emulation of
extreme existing corner cases.
There are two points to this: (1) Simplify and speed access, which
is the most common operation. (2) Support faithful emulation of
extreme existing corner cases.
WRT #2, the set of builtins in the scheme above is captured at the
time a module dict is first created. Mutations to the set of builtin
names following that don't get reflected in the module dicts. Example:
consider files main.py and cheater.py:
WRT #2, the set of builtins in the scheme above is captured at the
time a module dict is first created. Mutations to the set of builtin
names following that don't get reflected in the module dicts. Example:
consider files ``main.py`` and ``cheater.py``::
[main.py]
import cheater
def f():
cheater.cheat()
return pachinko()
print f()
[main.py]
import cheater
def f():
cheater.cheat()
return pachinko()
print f()
[cheater.py]
def cheat():
import __builtin__
__builtin__.pachinko = lambda: 666
[cheater.py]
def cheat():
import __builtin__
__builtin__.pachinko = lambda: 666
If main.py is run under Python 2.2 (or before), 666 is printed. But
under the proposal, __builtin__.pachinko doesn't exist at the time
main's __dict__ is initialized. When the function object for
f is created, main.__dict__ grows a pachinko cell mapping to two
NULLs. When cheat() is called, __builtin__.__dict__ grows a pachinko
cell too, but main.__dict__ doesn't know-- and will never know --about
that. When f's return stmt references pachinko, in will still find
the double-NULLs in main.__dict__'s pachinko cell, and so raise
NameError.
If ``main.py`` is run under Python 2.2 (or before), 666 is printed. But
under the proposal, ``__builtin__.pachinko`` doesn't exist at the time
main's ``__dict__`` is initialized. When the function object for
f is created, ``main.__dict__`` grows a pachinko cell mapping to two
``NULLs``. When ``cheat()`` is called, ``__builtin__.__dict__`` grows a pachinko
cell too, but ``main.__dict__`` doesn't know-- and will never know --about
that. When f's return stmt references pachinko, in will still find
the double-NULLs in ``main.__dict__``'s ``pachinko`` cell, and so raise
``NameError``.
A similar (in cause) break in compatibility can occur if a module
global foo is del'ed, but a builtin foo was created prior to that
but after the module dict was first created. Then the builtin foo
becomes visible in the module under 2.2 and before, but remains
invisible under the proposal.
A similar (in cause) break in compatibility can occur if a module
global foo is del'ed, but a builtin foo was created prior to that
but after the module dict was first created. Then the builtin foo
becomes visible in the module under 2.2 and before, but remains
invisible under the proposal.
Mutating builtins is extremely rare (most programs never mutate the
builtins, and it's hard to imagine a plausible use for frequent
mutation of the builtins -- I've never seen or heard of one), so it
doesn't matter how expensive mutating the builtins becomes. OTOH,
referencing globals and builtins is very common. Combining those
observations suggests a more aggressive caching of builtins in module
globals, speeding access at the expense of making mutations of the
builtins (potentially much) more expensive to keep the caches in
synch.
Mutating builtins is extremely rare (most programs never mutate the
builtins, and it's hard to imagine a plausible use for frequent
mutation of the builtins -- I've never seen or heard of one), so it
doesn't matter how expensive mutating the builtins becomes. OTOH,
referencing globals and builtins is very common. Combining those
observations suggests a more aggressive caching of builtins in module
globals, speeding access at the expense of making mutations of the
builtins (potentially much) more expensive to keep the caches in
synch.
Much of the scheme above remains the same, and most of the rest is
just a little different. A cell changes to:
Much of the scheme above remains the same, and most of the rest is
just a little different. A cell changes to::
class cell(object):
def __init__(self, obj=NULL, builtin=0):
self.objptr = obj
self.builtinflag = builtin
class cell(object):
def __init__(self, obj=NULL, builtin=0):
self.objptr = obj
self.builtinflag = builtin
and a celldict maps strings to this version of cells. builtinflag
is true when and only when objptr contains a value obtained from
the builtins; in other words, it's true when and only when a cell
is acting as a cached value. When builtinflag is false, objptr is
the value of a module global (possibly NULL). celldict changes to:
and a celldict maps strings to this version of cells. ``builtinflag``
is true when and only when objptr contains a value obtained from
the builtins; in other words, it's true when and only when a cell
is acting as a cached value. When ``builtinflag`` is false, objptr is
the value of a module global (possibly ``NULL``). celldict changes to::
class celldict(object):
class celldict(object):
def __init__(self, builtindict=()):
self.basedict = builtindict
self.__dict = d = {}
for k, v in builtindict.items():
d[k] = cell(v, 1)
def __init__(self, builtindict=()):
self.basedict = builtindict
self.__dict = d = {}
for k, v in builtindict.items():
d[k] = cell(v, 1)
def __getitem__(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None or c.objptr is NULL or c.builtinflag:
raise KeyError, key
return c.objptr
def __getitem__(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None or c.objptr is NULL or c.builtinflag:
raise KeyError, key
return c.objptr
def __setitem__(self, key, value):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None:
c = cell()
self.__dict[key] = c
c.objptr = value
c.builtinflag = 0
def __setitem__(self, key, value):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None:
c = cell()
self.__dict[key] = c
c.objptr = value
c.builtinflag = 0
def __delitem__(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None or c.objptr is NULL or c.builtinflag:
raise KeyError, key
c.objptr = NULL
# We may have unmasked a builtin. Note that because
# we're checking the builtin dict for that *now*, this
# still works if the builtin first came into existence
# after we were constructed. Note too that del on
# namespace dicts is rare, so the expensse of this check
# shouldn't matter.
if key in self.basedict:
c.objptr = self.basedict[key]
assert c.objptr is not NULL # else "in" lied
c.builtinflag = 1
else:
# There is no builtin with the same name.
assert not c.builtinflag
def __delitem__(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None or c.objptr is NULL or c.builtinflag:
raise KeyError, key
c.objptr = NULL
# We may have unmasked a builtin. Note that because
# we're checking the builtin dict for that *now*, this
# still works if the builtin first came into existence
# after we were constructed. Note too that del on
# namespace dicts is rare, so the expensse of this check
# shouldn't matter.
if key in self.basedict:
c.objptr = self.basedict[key]
assert c.objptr is not NULL # else "in" lied
c.builtinflag = 1
else:
# There is no builtin with the same name.
assert not c.builtinflag
def keys(self):
return [k for k, c in self.__dict.iteritems()
if c.objptr is not NULL and not c.builtinflag]
def keys(self):
return [k for k, c in self.__dict.iteritems()
if c.objptr is not NULL and not c.builtinflag]
def items(self):
return [k, c.objptr for k, c in self.__dict.iteritems()
if c.objptr is not NULL and not c.builtinflag]
def items(self):
return [k, c.objptr for k, c in self.__dict.iteritems()
if c.objptr is not NULL and not c.builtinflag]
def values(self):
preturn [c.objptr for c in self.__dict.itervalues()
if c.objptr is not NULL and not c.builtinflag]
def values(self):
preturn [c.objptr for c in self.__dict.itervalues()
if c.objptr is not NULL and not c.builtinflag]
def clear(self):
for c in self.__dict.values():
if not c.builtinflag:
c.objptr = NULL
def clear(self):
for c in self.__dict.values():
if not c.builtinflag:
c.objptr = NULL
# Etc.
# Etc.
The speed benefit comes from simplifying LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL, which
I expect is executed more frequently than all other namespace
operations combined:
The speed benefit comes from simplifying ``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL``, which
I expect is executed more frequently than all other namespace
operations combined::
def LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL(self, i):
# self is the frame
c = self.func_cells[i]
return c.objptr # may be NULL (also true before)
def LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL(self, i):
# self is the frame
c = self.func_cells[i]
return c.objptr # may be NULL (also true before)
That is, accessing builtins and accessing module globals are equally
fast. For module globals, a NULL-pointer test+branch is saved. For
builtins, an additional pointer chase is also saved.
That is, accessing builtins and accessing module globals are equally
fast. For module globals, a NULL-pointer test+branch is saved. For
builtins, an additional pointer chase is also saved.
The other part needed to make this fly is expensive, propagating
mutations of builtins into the module dicts that were initialized
from the builtins. This is much like, in 2.2, propagating changes
in new-style base classes to their descendants: the builtins need to
maintain a list of weakrefs to the modules (or module dicts)
initialized from the builtin's dict. Given a mutation to the builtin
dict (adding a new key, changing the value associated with an
existing key, or deleting a key), traverse the list of module dicts
and make corresponding mutations to them. This is straightforward;
for example, if a key is deleted from builtins, execute
reflect_bltin_del in each module:
The other part needed to make this fly is expensive, propagating
mutations of builtins into the module dicts that were initialized
from the builtins. This is much like, in 2.2, propagating changes
in new-style base classes to their descendants: the builtins need to
maintain a list of weakrefs to the modules (or module dicts)
initialized from the builtin's dict. Given a mutation to the builtin
dict (adding a new key, changing the value associated with an
existing key, or deleting a key), traverse the list of module dicts
and make corresponding mutations to them. This is straightforward;
for example, if a key is deleted from builtins, execute
``reflect_bltin_del`` in each module::
def reflect_bltin_del(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
assert c is not None # else we were already out of synch
if c.builtinflag:
# Put us back in synch.
c.objptr = NULL
c.builtinflag = 0
# Else we're shadowing the builtin, so don't care that
# the builtin went away.
def reflect_bltin_del(self, key):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
assert c is not None # else we were already out of synch
if c.builtinflag:
# Put us back in synch.
c.objptr = NULL
c.builtinflag = 0
# Else we're shadowing the builtin, so don't care that
# the builtin went away.
Note that c.builtinflag protects from us erroneously deleting a
module global of the same name. Adding a new (key, value) builtin
pair is similar:
Note that ``c.builtinflag`` protects from us erroneously deleting a
module global of the same name. Adding a new (key, value) builtin
pair is similar::
def reflect_bltin_new(self, key, value):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None:
# Never heard of it before: cache the builtin value.
self.__dict[key] = cell(value, 1)
elif c.objptr is NULL:
# This used to exist in the module or the builtins,
# but doesn't anymore; rehabilitate it.
assert not c.builtinflag
c.objptr = value
c.builtinflag = 1
else:
# We're shadowing it already.
assert not c.builtinflag
def reflect_bltin_new(self, key, value):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
if c is None:
# Never heard of it before: cache the builtin value.
self.__dict[key] = cell(value, 1)
elif c.objptr is NULL:
# This used to exist in the module or the builtins,
# but doesn't anymore; rehabilitate it.
assert not c.builtinflag
c.objptr = value
c.builtinflag = 1
else:
# We're shadowing it already.
assert not c.builtinflag
Changing the value of an existing builtin:
Changing the value of an existing builtin::
def reflect_bltin_change(self, key, newvalue):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
assert c is not None # else we were already out of synch
if c.builtinflag:
# Put us back in synch.
c.objptr = newvalue
# Else we're shadowing the builtin, so don't care that
# the builtin changed.
def reflect_bltin_change(self, key, newvalue):
c = self.__dict.get(key)
assert c is not None # else we were already out of synch
if c.builtinflag:
# Put us back in synch.
c.objptr = newvalue
# Else we're shadowing the builtin, so don't care that
# the builtin changed.
FAQs
====
Q. Will it still be possible to:
a) install new builtins in the __builtin__ namespace and have
them available in all already loaded modules right away ?
b) override builtins (e.g. open()) with my own copies
(e.g. to increase security) in a way that makes these new
copies override the previous ones in all modules ?
A. Yes, this is the whole point of this design. In the original
approach, when LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL finds a NULL in the second
cell, it should go back to see if the __builtins__ dict has
been modified (the pseudo code doesn't have this yet). Tim's
"more aggressive" alternative also takes care of this.
* Q: Will it still be possible to:
Q. How does the new scheme get along with the restricted execution
model?
a) install new builtins in the ``__builtin__`` namespace and have
them available in all already loaded modules right away ?
A. It is intended to support that fully.
b) override builtins (e.g. ``open()``) with my own copies
(e.g. to increase security) in a way that makes these new
copies override the previous ones in all modules ?
Q. What happens when a global is deleted?
A: Yes, this is the whole point of this design. In the original
approach, when ``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL`` finds a ``NULL`` in the second
cell, it should go back to see if the ``__builtins__`` dict has
been modified (the pseudo code doesn't have this yet). Tim's
"more aggressive" alternative also takes care of this.
A. The module's celldict would have a cell with a NULL objptr for
that key. This is true in both variations, but the "aggressive"
variation goes on to see whether this unmasks a builtin of the
same name, and if so copies its value (just a pointer-copy of the
ultimate PyObject*) into the cell's objptr and sets the cell's
builtinflag to true.
* Q: How does the new scheme get along with the restricted execution
model?
Q. What would the C code for LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL look like?
A: It is intended to support that fully.
A. The first version, with the first two bullets under "Additional
ideas" incorporated, could look like this:
* Q: What happens when a global is deleted?
case LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL:
cell = func_cells[oparg];
x = cell->objptr;
if (x == NULL) {
x = cell->cellptr->objptr;
if (x == NULL) {
... error recovery ...
break;
}
}
Py_INCREF(x);
PUSH(x);
continue;
A: The module's celldict would have a cell with a ``NULL`` objptr for
that key. This is true in both variations, but the "aggressive"
variation goes on to see whether this unmasks a builtin of the
same name, and if so copies its value (just a pointer-copy of the
ultimate ``PyObject*``) into the cell's objptr and sets the cell's
``builtinflag`` to true.
We could even write it like this (idea courtesy of Ka-Ping Yee):
* Q: What would the C code for ``LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL`` look like?
case LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL:
cell = func_cells[oparg];
x = cell->cellptr->objptr;
if (x != NULL) {
Py_INCREF(x);
PUSH(x);
continue;
}
... error recovery ...
break;
A: The first version, with the first two bullets under "Additional
ideas" incorporated, could look like this::
In modern CPU architectures, this reduces the number of
branches taken for built-ins, which might be a really good
thing, while any decent memory cache should realize that
cell->cellptr is the same as cell for regular globals and hence
this should be very fast in that case too.
case LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL:
cell = func_cells[oparg];
x = cell->objptr;
if (x == NULL) {
x = cell->cellptr->objptr;
if (x == NULL) {
... error recovery ...
break;
}
}
Py_INCREF(x);
PUSH(x);
continue;
For the aggressive variant:
We could even write it like this (idea courtesy of Ka-Ping Yee)::
case LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL:
cell = func_cells[oparg];
x = cell->objptr;
if (x != NULL) {
Py_INCREF(x);
PUSH(x);
continue;
}
... error recovery ...
break;
case LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL:
cell = func_cells[oparg];
x = cell->cellptr->objptr;
if (x != NULL) {
Py_INCREF(x);
PUSH(x);
continue;
}
... error recovery ...
break;
Q. What happens in the module's top-level code where there is
presumably no func_cells array?
In modern CPU architectures, this reduces the number of
branches taken for built-ins, which might be a really good
thing, while any decent memory cache should realize that
``cell->cellptr`` is the same as cell for regular globals and hence
this should be very fast in that case too.
A. We could do some code analysis and create a func_cells array,
or we could use LOAD_NAME which should use PyMapping_GetItem on
the globals dict.
For the aggressive variant::
case LOAD_GLOBAL_CELL:
cell = func_cells[oparg];
x = cell->objptr;
if (x != NULL) {
Py_INCREF(x);
PUSH(x);
continue;
}
... error recovery ...
break;
* Q: What happens in the module's top-level code where there is
presumably no ``func_cells`` array?
A: We could do some code analysis and create a ``func_cells`` array,
or we could use ``LOAD_NAME`` which should use ``PyMapping_GetItem`` on
the globals dict.
Graphics
========
Ka-Ping Yee supplied a drawing of the state of things after
"import spam", where spam.py contains:
Ka-Ping Yee supplied a drawing of the state of things after
"import spam", where ``spam.py`` contains::
import eggs
import eggs
i = -2
max = 3
i = -2
max = 3
def foo(n):
y = abs(i) + max
return eggs.ham(y + n)
def foo(n):
y = abs(i) + max
return eggs.ham(y + n)
The drawing is at http://web.lfw.org/repo/cells.gif; a larger
version is at http://lfw.org/repo/cells-big.gif; the source is at
http://lfw.org/repo/cells.ai.
The drawing is at http://web.lfw.org/repo/cells.gif; a larger
version is at http://lfw.org/repo/cells-big.gif; the source is at
http://lfw.org/repo/cells.ai.
Comparison
==========
XXX Here, a comparison of the three approaches could be added.
XXX Here, a comparison of the three approaches could be added.
Copyright
=========
This document has been placed in the public domain.
This document has been placed in the public domain.
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil
End:
..
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil
End: