From 78083574cda5f68d1ba7c0c3e97c635a9b46a922 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?=C5=81ukasz=20Langa?= <lukasz@langa.pl>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2013 17:38:57 +0200
Subject: [PATCH] Reject PEP 315.

---
 pep-0315.txt | 20 +++++++++++++-------
 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pep-0315.txt b/pep-0315.txt
index 6bf5571e5..a0990d134 100644
--- a/pep-0315.txt
+++ b/pep-0315.txt
@@ -4,7 +4,7 @@ Version: $Revision$
 Last-Modified: $Date$
 Author: Raymond Hettinger <python@rcn.com>
         W Isaac Carroll <icarroll@pobox.com>
-Status: Deferred
+Status: Rejected
 Type: Standards Track
 Content-Type: text/plain
 Created: 25-Apr-2003
@@ -21,19 +21,25 @@ Abstract
 
 Notice
 
-    Deferred; see
+    Rejected; see
+    http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-ideas/2013-June/021610.html
+
+    This PEP has been deferred since 2006; see
     http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060718.html
 
     Subsequent efforts to revive the PEP in April 2009 did not
     meet with success because no syntax emerged that could
-    compete with a while-True and an inner if-break.
+    compete with the following form:
 
-    A syntax was found for a basic do-while loop but it found
-    had little support because the condition was at the top:
-
-        do ... while <cond>:
+        while True:
+            <setup code>
+            if not <condition>:
+                break
             <loop body>
 
+    Users of the language are advised to use that form when a do-while
+    loop would have been appropriate.
+
 
 Motivation