Reject PEP 332. We'll have to start over with a new PEP.

This commit is contained in:
Guido van Rossum 2006-02-15 20:41:16 +00:00
parent 632baa0b9b
commit 86b2dc19d2
2 changed files with 13 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -97,7 +97,6 @@ Index by Category
S 321 Date/Time Parsing and Formatting Kuchling
S 323 Copyable Iterators Martelli
S 331 Locale-Independent Float/String Conversions Reis
S 332 Byte vectors and String/Unicode Unification Montanaro
S 334 Simple Coroutines via SuspendIteration Evans
S 335 Overloadable Boolean Operators Ewing
S 337 Logging Usage in the Standard Library Dubner
@ -219,6 +218,7 @@ Index by Category
SR 326 A Case for Top and Bottom Values Carlson, Reedy
SR 329 Treating Builtins as Constants in the Standard Library Hettinger
SR 330 Python Bytecode Verification Pelletier
SR 332 Byte vectors and String/Unicode Unification Montanaro
SR 336 Make None Callable McClelland
SR 340 Anonymous Block Statements GvR
SR 346 User Defined ("with") Statements Coghlan
@ -384,7 +384,7 @@ Numerical Index
SR 329 Treating Builtins as Constants in the Standard Library Hettinger
SR 330 Python Bytecode Verification Pelletier
S 331 Locale-Independent Float/String Conversions Reis
S 332 Byte vectors and String/Unicode Unification Montanaro
SR 332 Byte vectors and String/Unicode Unification Montanaro
I 333 Python Web Server Gateway Interface v1.0 Eby
S 334 Simple Coroutines via SuspendIteration Evans
S 335 Overloadable Boolean Operators Ewing

View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Title: Byte vectors and String/Unicode Unification
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Skip Montanaro <skip@pobox.com>
Status: Draft
Status: Rejected
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 11-Aug-2004
@ -18,6 +18,16 @@ This PEP outlines the introduction of a raw ``bytes`` sequence object
and the unification of the current ``str`` and ``unicode`` objects.
Rejection Notice
================
This PEP is rejected in this form. The author has expressed lack of
time to continue to shepherd it, and discussion on python-dev has
moved to a slightly different proposal which will (eventually) be
written up as a new PEP. See the thread starting at
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2006-February/060930.html.
Rationale
=========