From 94b51bc711a5d7ae4486153c3135574351f34231 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Yury Selivanov Date: Mon, 27 Apr 2015 23:05:58 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] pep-0492: Rename section --- pep-0492.txt | 4 ++-- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/pep-0492.txt b/pep-0492.txt index 4399b1a94..d8256d56a 100644 --- a/pep-0492.txt +++ b/pep-0492.txt @@ -948,8 +948,8 @@ stating that the statement is asynchronous. It is also more consistent with the existing grammar. -Why "async for/with" instead of "await for/with" ------------------------------------------------- +Why not "await for" and "await with" +------------------------------------ ``async`` is an adjective, and hence it is a better choice for a *statement qualifier* keyword. ``await for/with`` would imply that