Updated all the bug entries. Rehabilitated extended print. Added latest
commonprefix development. Added info about impending death of winreg.py.
This commit is contained in:
parent
55a199a5d1
commit
96bc2d31d7
43
pep-0200.txt
43
pep-0200.txt
|
@ -91,6 +91,12 @@ Failing test cases need to get fixed
|
|||
test case platform R B date reported
|
||||
--------- -------- - - -------------
|
||||
test_winreg2 Win32 X X 26-Jul-2000
|
||||
[19-Aug-2000 tim
|
||||
This test will never work on Win98, because it's looking for
|
||||
a part of registry that doesn't exist under W98.
|
||||
The module (winreg.py) and this test case will be removed
|
||||
before 2.0 for other reasons, though.
|
||||
]
|
||||
[still fails 15-Aug-2000 for me, on Win98 - tim
|
||||
test test_winreg2 failed -- Writing: 'Test Failed: testHives',
|
||||
expected: 'HKEY_PERFORMANCE_DATA\012'
|
||||
|
@ -107,6 +113,13 @@ Failing test cases need to get fixed
|
|||
|
||||
test_fork1 Linux X 26-Jul-2000 just SMP?
|
||||
[no clue; there are probably two bugs here]
|
||||
[19-Aug-200 tim
|
||||
Charles Waldman whipped up a patch to give child processes a new
|
||||
"global lock":
|
||||
http://sourceforge.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=101226&group_id=5470
|
||||
While this doesn't appear to address the symptoms we *saw*, it
|
||||
*does* so far appear to be fixing the failing cases anyway
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Previously failing test cases
|
||||
|
@ -137,6 +150,11 @@ Previously failing test cases
|
|||
but can't provoke anything wrong with test_longexp
|
||||
anymore; eyeballing Fred's changes didn't turn up
|
||||
a suspect either
|
||||
19-Aug-2000, tim: the "subtle bug" in regrtest.py -v is
|
||||
actually a feature: -v masks *some* kinds of failures,
|
||||
since it doesn't compare test output with the canned
|
||||
output; this is what makes it say "test passed" even
|
||||
in some cases where the test fails without -v
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -147,6 +165,19 @@ Open items -- should be done/fixed
|
|||
raised during hashing or comparison.
|
||||
|
||||
Decide what to do about os.path.commonprefix. Then do it.
|
||||
[19-Aug-2000 tim
|
||||
Guido msg on Python-Dev:
|
||||
- restore the old behavior on all platforms
|
||||
- add to the docs that to get the common directory you use dirname()
|
||||
- add testcases that check that this works on all platforms
|
||||
- don't add commonpathprefix(), because dirname() already does it
|
||||
]
|
||||
|
||||
Remove winreg.py and test_winreg2.py. Paul Prescod (the author)
|
||||
now wants to make a registry API more like the MS .NET API. Unclear
|
||||
whether that can be done in time for 2.0, but, regardless, if we
|
||||
let winreg.py out the door we'll be stuck with it forever, and not
|
||||
even Paul wants it anymore.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Accepted and completed
|
||||
|
@ -208,6 +239,12 @@ Accepted and in progress
|
|||
for normal slices as well as for extended ones. First step: use
|
||||
getitem if there is no getslice.
|
||||
|
||||
* Extended print statement - Barry Warsaw
|
||||
PEP 214
|
||||
http://python.sourceforge.net/peps/pep-0214.html
|
||||
SF Patch #100970
|
||||
http://sourceforge.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=100970&group_id=5470
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Open: proposed but not accepted or rejected
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -224,12 +261,6 @@ Open: proposed but not accepted or rejected
|
|||
|
||||
Postponed
|
||||
|
||||
* Extended print statement - Barry Warsaw
|
||||
PEP 214
|
||||
http://python.sourceforge.net/peps/pep-0214.html
|
||||
SF Patch #100970
|
||||
http://sourceforge.net/patch/?func=detailpatch&patch_id=100970&group_id=5470
|
||||
|
||||
* Eliminated SET_LINENO opcode - Vladimir Marangozov
|
||||
Small optimization achieved by using the code object's lnotab
|
||||
instead of the SET_LINENO instruction. Uses code rewriting
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue