From 977f841a114ee14220e8bf2b74f52a63b589c6b3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Brett Cannon <brett@python.org>
Date: Mon, 22 Jun 2020 14:58:41 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] Specify where to send discussions for PEP 621 (#1447)

---
 pep-0621.rst | 3 ++-
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/pep-0621.rst b/pep-0621.rst
index 8d2b4da57..12fbb935d 100644
--- a/pep-0621.rst
+++ b/pep-0621.rst
@@ -8,6 +8,7 @@ Author: Brett Cannon <brett@python.org>,
         Sébastien Eustace <sebastien@eustace.io>,
         Thomas Kluyver <thomas@kluyver.me.uk>,
         Tzu-Ping Chung <uranusjr@gmail.com>
+Discussions-To: https://discuss.python.org/t/pep-621-storing-project-metadata-in-pyproject-toml/4513
 Status: Draft
 Type: Standards Track
 Content-Type: text/x-rst
@@ -646,7 +647,7 @@ waiting until the user has run a tool in the case of :pep:`508`'s DSL.
 Supporters also believe it is easier to read and reason (both in
 general and for first-time users). They also point out that other
 programming languages have adopted a format more like an exploded
-table thanks to their use standardized configuration formats (e.g.
+table thanks to their use of standardized configuration formats (e.g.
 `Rust <https://doc.rust-lang.org/cargo/reference/specifying-dependencies.html>`__,
 and `Dart <https://dart.dev/tools/pub/dependencies>`__). The thinking
 is that an exploded table format would be more familiar to people