Change "not" -> "not necessarily" as Jeremy suggested
Fix typo
This commit is contained in:
parent
bf5099b6b6
commit
98315482b7
|
@ -35,9 +35,9 @@ Kinds of PEPs
|
|||
new feature or implementation for Python. An informational PEP
|
||||
describes a Python design issue, or provides general guidelines or
|
||||
information to the Python community, but does not propose a new
|
||||
feature. Informational PEPs do not represent a Python community
|
||||
consensus or recommendation, so users and implementors are free to
|
||||
ignore informational PEPs or follow their advice.
|
||||
feature. Informational PEPs do not necessarily represent a Python
|
||||
community consensus or recommendation, so users and implementors
|
||||
are free to ignore informational PEPs or follow their advice.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
PEP Work Flow
|
||||
|
@ -49,7 +49,7 @@ PEP Work Flow
|
|||
recommended that a single PEP contain a single key proposal or new
|
||||
idea. The more focussed the PEP, the more successfully it tends
|
||||
to be. The PEP editor reserves the right to reject PEP proposals
|
||||
if they appear to unfocussed or too broad. If in doubt, split
|
||||
if they appear too unfocussed or too broad. If in doubt, split
|
||||
your PEP into several well-focussed ones.
|
||||
|
||||
Each PEP must have a champion -- someone who writes the PEP using
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue