PEP 565: change the default warnings filter (#465)
This commit is contained in:
parent
cf3bad5ab3
commit
9a3d13f690
|
@ -0,0 +1,230 @@
|
|||
PEP: 565
|
||||
Title: Show DeprecationWarning in __main__
|
||||
Author: Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com>
|
||||
Status: Draft
|
||||
Type: Standards Track
|
||||
Content-Type: text/x-rst
|
||||
Created: 12-Nov-2017
|
||||
Python-Version: 3.7
|
||||
Post-History: 12-Nov-2017
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Abstract
|
||||
========
|
||||
|
||||
In Python 2.7 and Python 3.2, the default warning filters were updated to hide
|
||||
DeprecationWarning by default, such that deprecation warnings in development
|
||||
tools that were themselves written in Python (e.g. linters, static analysers,
|
||||
test runners, code generators) wouldn't be visible to their users unless they
|
||||
explicitly opted in to seeing them.
|
||||
|
||||
However, this change has had the unfortunate side effect of making
|
||||
DeprecationWarning markedly less effective at its primary intended purpose:
|
||||
providing advance notice of breaking changes in APIs (whether in CPython, the
|
||||
standard library, or in third party libraries) to users of those APIs.
|
||||
|
||||
To improve this situation, this PEP proposes a single adjustment to the
|
||||
default warnings filter: displaying deprecation warnings attributed to the main
|
||||
module by default.
|
||||
|
||||
This change will mean that code entered at the interactive prompt and code in
|
||||
single file scripts will revert to reporting these warnings by default, while
|
||||
they will continue to be silenced by default for packaged code distributed as
|
||||
part of an importable module.
|
||||
|
||||
The PEP also proposes a number of small adjustments to the reference
|
||||
interpreter and standard library documentation to help make the warnings
|
||||
subsystem more approachable for new Python developers.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Specification
|
||||
=============
|
||||
|
||||
The current set of default warnings filters consists of::
|
||||
|
||||
ignore::DeprecationWarning
|
||||
ignore::PendingDeprecationWarning
|
||||
ignore::ImportWarning
|
||||
ignore::BytesWarning
|
||||
ignore::ResourceWarning
|
||||
|
||||
The default ``unittest`` test runner then uses ``warnings.catch_warnings()``
|
||||
``warnings.simplefilter('default')`` to override the default filters while
|
||||
running test cases.
|
||||
|
||||
The change proposed in this PEP is to update the default warning filter list
|
||||
to be::
|
||||
|
||||
default::DeprecationWarning:__main__
|
||||
ignore::DeprecationWarning
|
||||
ignore::PendingDeprecationWarning
|
||||
ignore::ImportWarning
|
||||
ignore::BytesWarning
|
||||
ignore::ResourceWarning
|
||||
|
||||
This means that in cases where the nominal location of the warning (as
|
||||
determined by the ``stacklevel`` parameter to ``warnings.warn``) is in the
|
||||
``__main__`` module, the first occurrence of each DeprecationWarning will once
|
||||
again be reported.
|
||||
|
||||
This change will lead to DeprecationWarning being displayed by default for:
|
||||
|
||||
* code executed directly at the interactive prompt
|
||||
* code executed directly as part of a single-file script
|
||||
|
||||
While continuing to be hidden by default for:
|
||||
|
||||
* code imported from another module in a ``zipapp`` archive's ``__main__.py``
|
||||
file
|
||||
* code imported from another module in an executable package's ``__main__``
|
||||
submodule
|
||||
* code imported from an executable script wrapper generated at installation time
|
||||
based on a ``console_scripts`` or ``gui_scripts`` entry point definition
|
||||
|
||||
As a result, API deprecation warnings encountered by development tools written
|
||||
in Python should continue to be hidden by default for users of those tools
|
||||
|
||||
While not its originally intended purpose, the standard library documentation
|
||||
will also be updated to explicitly recommend the use of ``FutureWarning`` (rather
|
||||
than ``DeprecationWarning``) for backwards compatibility warnings that are
|
||||
intended to be seen by *users* of an application.
|
||||
|
||||
This will give the following three distinct categories of backwards
|
||||
compatibility warning, with three different intended audiences:
|
||||
|
||||
* ``PendingDeprecationWarning``: reported by default only in test runners that
|
||||
override the default set of warning filters. The intended audience is Python
|
||||
developers that take an active interest in ensuring the future compatibility
|
||||
of their software (e.g. professional Python application developers with
|
||||
specific support obligations).
|
||||
* ``DeprecationWarning``: reported by default for code that runs directly in
|
||||
the ``__main__`` module (as such code is considered relatively unlikely to
|
||||
have a dedicated test suite), but relies on test suite based reporting for
|
||||
code in other modules. The intended audience is Python developers that are at
|
||||
risk of upgrades to their dependencies (including upgrades to Python itself)
|
||||
breaking their software (e.g. developers using Python to script environments
|
||||
where someone else is in control of the timing of dependency upgrades).
|
||||
* ``FutureWarning``: always reported by default. The intended audience is users
|
||||
of applications written in Python, rather than other Python developers
|
||||
(e.g. warning about use of a deprecated setting in a configuration file
|
||||
format).
|
||||
|
||||
Given its presence in the standard library since Python 2.3, ``FutureWarning``
|
||||
would then also have a secondary use case for libraries and frameworks that
|
||||
support multiple Python versions: as a more reliably visible alternative to
|
||||
``DeprecationWarning`` in Python 2.7 and versions of Python 3.x prior to 3.7.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Motivation
|
||||
==========
|
||||
|
||||
As discussed in [1_] and mentioned in [2_], Python 2.7 and Python 3.2 changed
|
||||
the default handling of ``DeprecationWarning`` such that:
|
||||
|
||||
* the warning was hidden by default during normal code execution
|
||||
* the `unittest`` test runner was updated to re-enable it when running tests
|
||||
|
||||
The intent was to avoid cases of tooling output like the following::
|
||||
|
||||
$ devtool mycode/
|
||||
/usr/lib/python3.6/site-packages/devtool/cli.py:1: DeprecationWarning: 'async' and 'await' will become reserved keywords in Python 3.7
|
||||
async = True
|
||||
... actual tool output ...
|
||||
|
||||
Even when `devtool` is a tool specifically for Python programmers, this is not
|
||||
a particularly useful warning, as it will be shown on every invocation, even
|
||||
though the main helpful step an end user can take is to report a bug to the
|
||||
developers of ``devtool``. The warning is even less helpful for general purpose
|
||||
developer tools that are used across more languages than just Python.
|
||||
|
||||
However, this change proved to have unintended consequences for the following
|
||||
audiences:
|
||||
|
||||
* anyone using a test runner other than the default one built into ``unittest``
|
||||
(since the request for third party test runners to change their default
|
||||
warnings filters was never made explicitly)
|
||||
* anyone using the default ``unittest`` test runner to test their Python code
|
||||
in a subprocess (since even ``unittest`` only adjusts the warnings settings
|
||||
in the current process)
|
||||
* anyone writing Python code at the interactive prompt or as part of a directly
|
||||
executed script that didn't have a Python level test suite at all
|
||||
|
||||
In these cases, ``DeprecationWarning`` ended up become almost entirely
|
||||
equivalent to ``PendingDeprecationWarning``: it was simply never seen at all.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Limitations on PEP Scope
|
||||
========================
|
||||
|
||||
This PEP exists specifically to explain both the proposed addition to the
|
||||
default warnings filter for 3.7, *and* to more clearly articulate the rationale
|
||||
for the original change to the handling of DeprecationWarning back in Python 2.7
|
||||
and 3.2.
|
||||
|
||||
This PEP does not solve all known problems with the current approach to handling
|
||||
deprecation warnings. Most notably:
|
||||
|
||||
* the default ``unittest`` test runner does not currently report deprecation
|
||||
warnings emitted at module import time, as the warnings filter override is only
|
||||
put in place during test execution, not during test discovery and loading.
|
||||
* the default ``unittest`` test runner does not currently report deprecation
|
||||
warnings in subprocesses, as the warnings filter override is applied directly
|
||||
to the loaded ``warnings`` module, not to the ``PYTHONWARNINGS`` environment
|
||||
variable.
|
||||
* the standard library doesn't provide a straightforward way to opt-in to seeing
|
||||
all warnings emitted *by* a particular dependency prior to upgrading it
|
||||
(the third-party ``warn`` module [3_] does provide this, but enabling it
|
||||
involves monkeypatching the standard library's ``warnings`` module).
|
||||
* re-enabling deprecation warnings by default in __main__ doesn't help in
|
||||
handling cases where software has been factored out into support modules, but
|
||||
those modules still have little or no automated test coverage. Near term, the
|
||||
best currently available answer is to run such applications with
|
||||
``PYTHONWARNINGS=default::DeprecationWarning`` or
|
||||
``python -W default::DeprecationWarning`` and pay attention to their
|
||||
``stderr`` output. Longer term, this is really a question for researchers
|
||||
working on static analysis of Python code: how to reliably find usage of
|
||||
deprecated APIs, and how to infer that an API or parameter is deprecated
|
||||
based on ``warnings.warn`` calls, without actually running either the code
|
||||
providing the API or the code accessing it
|
||||
|
||||
While these are real problems with the status quo, they're excluded from
|
||||
consideration in this PEP because they're going to require more complex
|
||||
solutions than a single additional entry in the default warnings filter,
|
||||
and resolving them at least potentially won't require going through the PEP
|
||||
process.
|
||||
|
||||
For anyone interested in pursuing them further, the first two would be
|
||||
``unittest`` module enhancement requests, the third would be a ``warnings``
|
||||
module enhancement request, while the last would only require a PEP if
|
||||
inferring API deprecations from their contents was deemed to be an intractable
|
||||
code analysis problem, and an explicit function and parameter marker syntax in
|
||||
annotations was proposed instead.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
References
|
||||
==========
|
||||
|
||||
.. [1] stdlib-sig thread proposing the original default filter change
|
||||
(https://mail.python.org/pipermail/stdlib-sig/2009-November/000789.html)
|
||||
|
||||
.. [2] Python 2.7 notification of the default warnings filter change
|
||||
(https://docs.python.org/3/whatsnew/2.7.html#changes-to-the-handling-of-deprecation-warnings)
|
||||
|
||||
.. [3] Emitting warnings based on the location of the warning itself
|
||||
(https://pypi.org/project/warn/)
|
||||
|
||||
Copyright
|
||||
=========
|
||||
|
||||
This document has been placed in the public domain.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
..
|
||||
Local Variables:
|
||||
mode: indented-text
|
||||
indent-tabs-mode: nil
|
||||
sentence-end-double-space: t
|
||||
fill-column: 70
|
||||
coding: utf-8
|
||||
End:
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue