From 9f16d1c9d5517dfc0f1940d0ce0efdb311ef39c2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Raymond Hettinger Date: Tue, 16 Dec 2008 03:52:16 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Fix typos. --- pep-3128.txt | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/pep-3128.txt b/pep-3128.txt index f7acd4def..9fed625f3 100644 --- a/pep-3128.txt +++ b/pep-3128.txt @@ -15,14 +15,14 @@ Post-History: 30-Apr-2007 Rejection Notice ================ -Rejectd based on Raymond Hettinger's sage advice [4]_: +Rejected based on Raymond Hettinger's sage advice [4]_: After looking at the source, I think this has almost zero chance for replacing list(). There is too much value in a simple C API, low space overhead for small lists, good performance is common use cases, and having performance that is easily understood. The - BList implementation lacks these virtues and trades-off a little - performance is common cases for much better performance in + BList implementation lacks these virtues and it trades-off a little + performance in common cases in for much better performance in uncommon cases. As a Py3.0 PEP, I think it can be rejected. Depending on its success as a third-party module, it still has a