PEP 8: try to better explain a somewhat cryptic guideline
This commit is contained in:
parent
1eb3bdaecd
commit
a240f27644
|
@ -121,9 +121,12 @@ Optional::
|
||||||
var_one, var_two,
|
var_one, var_two,
|
||||||
var_three, var_four)
|
var_three, var_four)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
This PEP explicitly takes no position on how or whether to further
|
This PEP explicitly takes no position on how (or whether) to further
|
||||||
visually distinguish continuation lines after multi-line ``if``
|
visually distinguish continuation lines in the header from the nested suite
|
||||||
statements. Some acceptable options include::
|
in an ``if`` statement, where the combination of a two character keyword, a
|
||||||
|
single space and an opening parenthesis creates a natural 4-space indent for
|
||||||
|
the expression in the header. Some acceptable options in this situation
|
||||||
|
include::
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
# No extra indentation.
|
# No extra indentation.
|
||||||
if (this
|
if (this
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue