PEP 649: Fix nested list formatting (#2856)
This commit is contained in:
parent
4a2e3e3059
commit
a3310aeeff
|
@ -199,9 +199,11 @@ them to their actual Python values. This has several drawbacks:
|
||||||
implementation.
|
implementation.
|
||||||
* It requires that all annotations be evaluated at module-level
|
* It requires that all annotations be evaluated at module-level
|
||||||
scope. Annotations under :pep:`563` can no longer refer to
|
scope. Annotations under :pep:`563` can no longer refer to
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* class variables,
|
* class variables,
|
||||||
* local variables in the current function, or
|
* local variables in the current function, or
|
||||||
* local variables in enclosing functions.
|
* local variables in enclosing functions.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* It requires a code change every time existing code uses an
|
* It requires a code change every time existing code uses an
|
||||||
annotation, to handle converting the stringized
|
annotation, to handle converting the stringized
|
||||||
annotation back into a useful value.
|
annotation back into a useful value.
|
||||||
|
@ -224,10 +226,12 @@ This PEP also solves the forward reference problem outlined in
|
||||||
* Python implementations would generate annotations as code
|
* Python implementations would generate annotations as code
|
||||||
objects. This is simpler than stringizing, and is something
|
objects. This is simpler than stringizing, and is something
|
||||||
Python implementations are already quite good at. This means:
|
Python implementations are already quite good at. This means:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- alternate implementations would need to write less code to
|
- alternate implementations would need to write less code to
|
||||||
implement this feature, and
|
implement this feature, and
|
||||||
- the implementation would be simpler overall, which should
|
- the implementation would be simpler overall, which should
|
||||||
reduce its ongoing maintenance cost.
|
reduce its ongoing maintenance cost.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
* Existing annotations would not need to be changed to only
|
* Existing annotations would not need to be changed to only
|
||||||
use global scope. Actually, annotations would become much
|
use global scope. Actually, annotations would become much
|
||||||
easier to use, as they would now also handle forward
|
easier to use, as they would now also handle forward
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue