Clarify once more that "if []" will remain valid Python forever.

pep-0285.txt

@@ -115,6 +115,18 @@ Review
        container is interpreted as a truth value, an empty container
        is considered false and a non-empty one is considered true."
 
+    8) Should we strive to require that Boolean operations (like "if",
+       "and", "not") have a bool as an argument in the future, so that
+       for example "if []:" would become illegal and would have to be
+       writen as "if bool([]):" ???
+
+    => No!!!  Some people believe that this is how a language with a
+       Boolean type should behave.  Because it was brought up, others
+       have worried that I might agree with this position.  Let me
+       make my position on this quite clear.  This is not part of the
+       PEP's motivation and I don't intend to make this change.  (See
+       also the section "Clarification" below.)
+
 
 Rationale