Added the conversion of very large longs as an open issue.
This commit is contained in:
parent
e597ec7194
commit
b1aa62b3b8
|
@ -193,7 +193,7 @@ Alternatives
|
||||||
multiple interpreters installed.
|
multiple interpreters installed.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Specification
|
API Changes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
During the transitional phase, we have to support *three* division
|
During the transitional phase, we have to support *three* division
|
||||||
operators within the same program: classic division (for / in
|
operators within the same program: classic division (for / in
|
||||||
|
@ -355,6 +355,13 @@ Open Issues
|
||||||
need the same. These usually have enough control over the
|
need the same. These usually have enough control over the
|
||||||
library packages available in their environment.
|
library packages available in their environment.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- For very large long integers, the definition of true division as
|
||||||
|
returning a float causes problems, since the range of Python
|
||||||
|
longs is much larger than that of Python floats. This problem
|
||||||
|
will disappear if and when rational numbers are supported. In
|
||||||
|
the interim, maybe the long-to-float conversion could be made to
|
||||||
|
raise OverflowError if the long is out of range.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
FAQ
|
FAQ
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue