Changes discussed in the mailing list.

pep-0237.txt

@@ -111,6 +111,9 @@ Open Issues
     Will unification of types and classes help with a more straightforward
     implementations?
 
+    Define an C API that can be used to find out what the representation of an 
+    int is.
+
 
 Copyright
 

pep-0238.txt

@@ -89,6 +89,7 @@ Open Issues
 
     Should the // operator be renamed to "div"?
 
+    Should the // be made into a function called "div"?
 
 References
 

pep-0239.txt

@@ -37,15 +37,12 @@ RationalType
     floats and complexes.
 
     The following attributes will be supported: .numerator and
-    .denominator.  The language definition will not define these other
-    then that:
+    .denominator.  The language definition will promise that
 
         r.denominator * r == r.numerator
 
-    In particular, no guarantees are made regarding the GCD or the
-    sign of the denominator, even though in the proposed
-    implementation, the GCD is always 1 and the denominator is always
-    positive.
+    that the GCD of the numerator and the denominator is 1 and that
+    the denominator is positive.
 
     The method r.trim(max_denominator) will return the closest
     rational s to r such that abs(s.denominator) <= max_denominator.