From c02c7f2145f74d2a54d69b09d5de7b66b2bb6042 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2013 23:20:37 +1000
Subject: [PATCH] Reject PEP 439

---
 pep-0439.txt | 12 ++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/pep-0439.txt b/pep-0439.txt
index 97bafeaf9..931b75767 100644
--- a/pep-0439.txt
+++ b/pep-0439.txt
@@ -1,16 +1,17 @@
 PEP: 439
-Title: Inclusion of pip bootstrap in Python installation
+Title: Inclusion of implicit pip bootstrap in Python installation
 Version: $Revision$
 Last-Modified: $Date$
 Author: Richard Jones <richard@python.org>
 BDFL-Delegate:  Nick Coghlan <ncoghlan@gmail.com>
 Discussions-To: <distutils-sig@python.org>
-Status: Draft
+Status: Rejected
 Type: Standards Track
 Content-Type: text/x-rst
 Created: 18-Mar-2013
 Python-Version: 3.4
 Post-History: 19-Mar-2013
+Resolution: http://mail.python.org/pipermail/distutils-sig/2013-August/022527.html
 
 
 Abstract
@@ -26,6 +27,13 @@ management or installation mechanisms beyond those provided by PEP
 427 ("The Wheel Binary Package Format 1.0") and TODO distlib PEP.
 
 
+PEP Rejection
+=============
+
+This PEP has been rejected in favour of a more explicit mechanism that
+should achieve the same end result in a more reliable fashion. The more
+explicit bootstrapping mechanism is described in PEP 453.
+
 Rationale
 =========