PEP 448: Fix misleading passage in the abstract (#3573)

The passage in the PEP misleads its readers into believing, that
unpacking in comprehensions is supported. This is not the case, as
presented by the abstract itself:

> This PEP does not include unpacking operators inside list, set and
> dictionary comprehensions although this has not been ruled out for
> future proposals.

(Historically, the PEP originally did propose this, but that part of
the PEP was rejected, and the abstract wasn't completely updated.)
This commit is contained in:
Blazej Michalik 2023-12-11 19:58:32 +01:00 committed by GitHub
parent 8788f8875d
commit c15cbba664
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 1 additions and 3 deletions

View File

@ -16,9 +16,7 @@ Abstract
This PEP proposes extended usages of the ``*`` iterable unpacking This PEP proposes extended usages of the ``*`` iterable unpacking
operator and ``**`` dictionary unpacking operators operator and ``**`` dictionary unpacking operators
to allow unpacking in more positions, an arbitrary number of to allow unpacking in more positions, an arbitrary number of
times, and in additional circumstances. Specifically, times, and in function calls and displays.
in function calls, in comprehensions and generator expressions, and
in displays.
Function calls are proposed to support an arbitrary number of Function calls are proposed to support an arbitrary number of
unpackings rather than just one:: unpackings rather than just one::