Dropping unbound methods has become more likely.

This commit is contained in:
Guido van Rossum 2007-11-24 17:54:55 +00:00
parent fa9d5fb304
commit c47893b00e
1 changed files with 4 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -121,7 +121,7 @@ To be removed:
* ```x```: use ``repr(x)`` [2]_ [done] * ```x```: use ``repr(x)`` [2]_ [done]
* The ``<>`` operator: use ``!=`` instead [3]_ [done] * The ``<>`` operator: use ``!=`` instead [3]_ [done]
* The __mod__ and __divmod__ special methods on float. [they should stay] [21]_ * The __mod__ and __divmod__ special methods on float. [they should stay] [21]_
* Might drop unbound methods? [7]_ [UNLIKELY] * Drop unbound methods[7]_ [25]_
* METH_OLDARGS * METH_OLDARGS
* WITH_CYCLE_GC [done] * WITH_CYCLE_GC [done]
* __getslice__, __setslice__, __delslice__ [#sequence-types]_; * __getslice__, __setslice__, __delslice__ [#sequence-types]_;
@ -343,6 +343,9 @@ References
.. [25] python-3000 email ("Py3.0 Library Ideas") .. [25] python-3000 email ("Py3.0 Library Ideas")
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2007-February/005726.html http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-3000/2007-February/005726.html
.. [26] python-dev email ("Should we do away with unbound methods in Py3k?")
http://mail.python.org/pipermail/python-dev/2007-November/075279.html
.. [#sys-module] Python docs (sys -- System-specific parameters and functions) .. [#sys-module] Python docs (sys -- System-specific parameters and functions)
http://docs.python.org/lib/module-sys.html http://docs.python.org/lib/module-sys.html