From cd1c9d418e2ef8a6b2a70f832143ec91592acfe0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: "Eric V. Smith" Date: Tue, 1 May 2012 12:41:37 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Improvement in wording. --- pep-0420.txt | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/pep-0420.txt b/pep-0420.txt index 0146eec04..06a7c9b9d 100644 --- a/pep-0420.txt +++ b/pep-0420.txt @@ -201,7 +201,8 @@ They are: Nick gave a detailed response [4]_, which is summarized here: - 1. Practicality beats purity. + 1. The practicality of this PEP wins over other proposals and the + status quo. 2. Minor backward compatibility issues are okay, as long as they are properly documented.