PEP 665: make using PEP 621 as input a rejected idea

This commit is contained in:
Brett Cannon 2021-11-16 11:32:58 -08:00
parent 1d3deac884
commit d6c4aa7a8e
1 changed files with 11 additions and 13 deletions

View File

@ -756,6 +756,17 @@ to reflect the granularity that dependencies can truly be specified
at. at.
----------------------------------
Specify Where Lockers Gather Input
----------------------------------
This PEP does not specify how a locker gets its input. An initial
suggestion was to partially reuse PEP 621, but due to disagreements
on how flexible the potential input should be in terms of specifying
things such as indexes, etc., it was decided this would best be left
to a separate PEP.
=========== ===========
Open Issues Open Issues
=========== ===========
@ -796,19 +807,6 @@ probably capable of providing wheels, making support for sdists that
much less important/useful. much less important/useful.
----------------------------------
Specify Where Lockers Gather Input
----------------------------------
This PEP currently does not specify how a locker gets its input. It
could be possible to support a subset of PEP 621 such that
``project.requires-python`` and ``project.dependencies`` are read
from ``pyproject.toml`` and automatically used as input if provided.
But this or some other practice could also be left as something to
grow organically in the community and making that the standard at a
later date.
=============== ===============
Acknowledgments Acknowledgments
=============== ===============