iSharkFly-Open
/
python-peps
mirror of https://github.com/python/peps.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

PEP 3111 (restoring input) has been implemented so mark it Final. 

Also wrap some long lines in the PEP.
This commit is contained in:
Neal Norwitz 2007-05-25 06:17:11 +00:00
parent a2f9ba67ff
commit e0ce1d9e0a
2 changed files with 8 additions and 8 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

4
pep-0000.txt
View File

@ -77,7 +77,6 @@ Index by Category
SA 358 The "bytes" Object Schemenauer, GvR
SA 3106 Revamping dict.keys(), .values() & .items() GvR
SA 3109 Raising Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
SA 3111 Simple input built-in in Python 3000 Roberge
SA 3112 Bytes literals in Python 3000 Orendorff
SA 3115 Metaclasses in Python 3000 Talin
SA 3119 Introducing Abstract Base Classes GvR, Talin
@ -173,6 +172,7 @@ Index by Category
SF 3105 Make print a function Brandl
SF 3107 Function Annotations Winter, Lownds
SF 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
SF 3111 Simple input built-in in Python 3000 Roberge
SF 3113 Removal of Tuple Parameter Unpacking Cannon
SF 3114 Renaming iterator.next() to .__next__() Yee
SF 3129 Class Decorators Winter
@ -481,7 +481,7 @@ Numerical Index
S 3108 Standard Library Reorganization Cannon
SA 3109 Raising Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
SF 3110 Catching Exceptions in Python 3000 Winter
SA 3111 Simple input built-in in Python 3000 Roberge
SF 3111 Simple input built-in in Python 3000 Roberge
SA 3112 Bytes literals in Python 3000 Orendorff
SF 3113 Removal of Tuple Parameter Unpacking Cannon
SF 3114 Renaming iterator.next() to .__next__() Yee

12
pep-3111.txt
View File

@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Title: Simple input built-in in Python 3000
Version: $Revision$
Last-Modified: $Date$
Author: Andre Roberge <andre.roberge at gmail.com >
Status: Accepted
Status: Final
Type: Standards Track
Content-Type: text/x-rst
Created: 13-Sep-2006
@ -108,9 +108,9 @@ The Python 2 to 3 conversion tool will replace calls to ``input()`` with
Naming Discussion
=================
With ``input()`` effectively removed from the language, the name ``raw_input()``
makes much less sense and alternatives should be considered. The
various possibilities mentioned in various forums include::
With ``input()`` effectively removed from the language,
the name ``raw_input()`` makes much less sense and alternatives should be
considered. The various possibilities mentioned in various forums include::
ask()
ask_user()
@ -121,8 +121,8 @@ various possibilities mentioned in various forums include::
user_input()
get_response()
While it was initially rejected by the BDFL, it has been suggested that the most
direct solution would be to rename "raw_input" to "input" in Python 3000.
While it was initially rejected by the BDFL, it has been suggested that the
most direct solution would be to rename "raw_input" to "input" in Python 3000.
The main objection is that Python 2.x already has a function named "input",
and, even though it is not going to be included in Python 3000,
having a built-in function with the same name but different semantics may