explain why hash is not the default
This commit is contained in:
parent
8492ed6abf
commit
e4bcab24d7
|
@ -46,7 +46,13 @@ Distributors of Python code are currently stuck with the options of
|
|||
4. doing a complicated mixture of 1. and 2. like generating pycs at installation
|
||||
time
|
||||
|
||||
None of these options are very attractive. This PEP proposes a better solution.
|
||||
None of these options are very attractive. This PEP proposes allowing the
|
||||
timestamp to be replaced with a deterministic hash. The current timestamp
|
||||
invalidation method will remain the default, though. Despite its nondeterminism,
|
||||
timestamp invalidation works well for many workflows and usecases. The
|
||||
hash-based pyc format can impose the cost of reading and hashing every source
|
||||
file, which is more expensive than simply checking timestamps. Thus, for now, we
|
||||
expect it to be used mainly by distributors and power use cases.
|
||||
|
||||
(Note there are other problems [#frozensets]_ [#interning]_ we do not
|
||||
address here that can make pycs non-deterministic.)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue