Added Paul's latest crop of names to the list of proposed alternatives
in Open Issues.
This commit is contained in:
parent
516a1a8b52
commit
e6b5c62573
11
pep-0201.txt
11
pep-0201.txt
|
@ -375,10 +375,13 @@ Open Issues
|
|||
with the zip compression algorithm. Other suggestions include
|
||||
(but are not limited to!): marry, weave, parallel, lace, braid,
|
||||
interlace, permute, furl, tuples, lists, stitch, collate, knit,
|
||||
plait, fold, and with. All have disadvantages, and there is no
|
||||
clear unanimous choice, therefore the decision was made to go
|
||||
with `zip' because the same functionality is available in other
|
||||
languages (e.g. Haskell) under the name `zip'[2].
|
||||
plait, fold, with, mktuples, maketuples, totuples, gentuples,
|
||||
tupleorama.
|
||||
|
||||
All have disadvantages, and there is no clear unanimous choice,
|
||||
therefore the decision was made to go with `zip' because the
|
||||
same functionality is available in other languages
|
||||
(e.g. Haskell) under the name `zip'[2].
|
||||
|
||||
- Should zip() be including in the builtins module or should it be
|
||||
in a separate generators module (possibly with other candidate
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue