iSharkFly-Open
/
python-peps
mirror of https://github.com/python/peps.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

Added pointer to features/pep-420 branch.

This commit is contained in:
Eric V. Smith 2012-04-24 07:12:00 -04:00
parent 660b6e478c
commit e7bef9d9f5
1 changed files with 7 additions and 5 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

12
pep-0420.txt
View File

@ -19,7 +19,7 @@ versions, an algorithm to compute the packages ``__path__`` must be
formulated. With the enhancement proposed here, the import machinery
itself will construct the list of directories that make up the
package. This PEP builds upon the work started in rejected PEPs 382
and 402.
and 402. An implementation of this PEP is at [1]_.
Terminology
===========
@ -162,10 +162,10 @@ as a namespace package, whereas in prior Python versions an
ImportError would be raised.
At PyCon 2012, we had a discussion about namespace packages at which
PEP 382 and PEP 402 were rejected, to be replaced by this PEP [1]_.
PEP 382 and PEP 402 were rejected, to be replaced by this PEP [2]_.
Nick Coglan presented a list of his objections to this proposal
[2]_. They are:
[3]_. They are:
* Implicit package directories go against the Zen of Python
@ -184,10 +184,12 @@ Nick Coglan presented a list of his objections to this proposal
References
==========
.. [1] PyCon 2012 Namespace Package discussion outcome
.. [1] PEP 420 branch (http://hg.python.org/features/pep-420)
.. [2] PyCon 2012 Namespace Package discussion outcome
(http://mail.python.org/pipermail/import-sig/2012-March/000421.html)
.. [2] Nick Coglan's objection to the lack of marker files or directories
.. [3] Nick Coglan's objection to the lack of marker files or directories
(http://mail.python.org/pipermail/import-sig/2012-March/000423.html)
Copyright