PEP 8014: added timeout for deferred PEPs and minor clarifications (#836)
* Added timeout for deferred PEPs and some clarifications.
This commit is contained in:
parent
939c89d87f
commit
ebc824403a
|
@ -129,7 +129,9 @@ They pronounce a tentative decision on whether the vote passed and this decision
|
||||||
If the decision is that the vote results do not demonstrate enough support
|
If the decision is that the vote results do not demonstrate enough support
|
||||||
from the community for the decision the burden is on the author to try and
|
from the community for the decision the burden is on the author to try and
|
||||||
gather more support and resubmit the vote at a later date. Alternatively the
|
gather more support and resubmit the vote at a later date. Alternatively the
|
||||||
author can retract the proposal.
|
author can retract the proposal. The period for gathering more support is
|
||||||
|
time-limited, a month seems a reasonable time, if no vote has been resubmitted
|
||||||
|
after that period the proposal is rejected.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If the tentative decision is that the results *do* demonstrate enough support
|
If the tentative decision is that the results *do* demonstrate enough support
|
||||||
a fairly short waiting period starts (in the order of weeks). During this
|
a fairly short waiting period starts (in the order of weeks). During this
|
||||||
|
@ -234,7 +236,7 @@ The council should not be too big nor too small, probably somewhere between
|
||||||
5 and 10 members. There is no reason to fix this number.
|
5 and 10 members. There is no reason to fix this number.
|
||||||
The members should be knowledgeable about Python and the
|
The members should be knowledgeable about Python and the
|
||||||
Python community, and willing to be impartial *while operating as part of
|
Python community, and willing to be impartial *while operating as part of
|
||||||
the council*.
|
the council*. Council members may be core developers but this is not a requirement.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Everyone in the community should feel represented by the council so it would
|
Everyone in the community should feel represented by the council so it would
|
||||||
be good if the council is diverse:
|
be good if the council is diverse:
|
||||||
|
@ -273,7 +275,7 @@ Elder that individual immedeately lose their council position, independent of
|
||||||
the outcome of the vote. If the vote has been requested by community members and
|
the outcome of the vote. If the vote has been requested by community members and
|
||||||
the council is reinstated this procedure cannot be invoked again for a year.
|
the council is reinstated this procedure cannot be invoked again for a year.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If there is no functioning council (the current situation, or after the
|
If there is no functioning council (the current initial situation, or after the
|
||||||
council have lost their mandate after a vote of no confidence) an initial
|
council have lost their mandate after a vote of no confidence) an initial
|
||||||
council must be selected. Through the normal communication channels (discourse,
|
council must be selected. Through the normal communication channels (discourse,
|
||||||
mailing lists) members can be suggested by anyone (including themselves). After
|
mailing lists) members can be suggested by anyone (including themselves). After
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue