Spell checked
This commit is contained in:
parent
200959cb61
commit
fb0080cbcb
63
pep-0302.txt
63
pep-0302.txt
|
@ -3,7 +3,7 @@ Title: New Import Hooks
|
|||
Version: $Revision$
|
||||
Last-Modified: $Date$
|
||||
Author: Just van Rossum <just@letterror.com>,
|
||||
Paul Moore <gustav@morpheus.demon.co.uk>
|
||||
Paul Moore <gustav@morpheus.demon.co.uk>
|
||||
Status: Draft
|
||||
Type: Standards Track
|
||||
Content-Type: text/plain
|
||||
|
@ -24,7 +24,7 @@ Abstract
|
|||
Motivation
|
||||
|
||||
The only way to customize the import mechanism is currently to
|
||||
override the builtin __import__ function. However, overriding
|
||||
override the built-in __import__ function. However, overriding
|
||||
__import__ has many problems. To begin with:
|
||||
|
||||
- An __import__ replacement needs to *fully* reimplement the entire
|
||||
|
@ -68,7 +68,7 @@ Use cases
|
|||
database over a network.
|
||||
|
||||
The work on this PEP was partly triggered by the implementation of
|
||||
PEP 273 [2], which adds imports from Zip archives as a builtin
|
||||
PEP 273 [2], which adds imports from Zip archives as a built-in
|
||||
feature to Python. While the PEP itself was widely accepted as a
|
||||
must-have feature, the implementation left a few things to desire.
|
||||
For one thing it went through great lengths to integrate itself with
|
||||
|
@ -102,28 +102,29 @@ Use cases
|
|||
emulation code.
|
||||
|
||||
Before work on the design and implementation of this PEP was
|
||||
started, a new BuildApplication-like tool for MacOSX prompted one of
|
||||
the authors of this PEP (JvR) to expose the table of frozen modules
|
||||
to Python, in the imp module. The main reason was to be able to use
|
||||
the freeze import hook (avoiding fancy __import__ support), yet to
|
||||
also be able to supply a set of modules at runtime. This resulted
|
||||
in sf patch #642578 [6], which was mysteriously accepted (mostly
|
||||
because nobody seemed to care either way ;-). Yet it is completely
|
||||
superfluous when this PEP gets accepted, as it offers a much nicer
|
||||
and general way to do the same thing.
|
||||
started, a new BuildApplication-like tool for MacOS X prompted one
|
||||
of the authors of this PEP (JvR) to expose the table of frozen
|
||||
modules to Python, in the imp module. The main reason was to be
|
||||
able to use the freeze import hook (avoiding fancy __import__
|
||||
support), yet to also be able to supply a set of modules at
|
||||
runtime. This resulted in sf patch #642578 [6], which was
|
||||
mysteriously accepted (mostly because nobody seemed to care either
|
||||
way ;-). Yet it is completely superfluous when this PEP gets
|
||||
accepted, as it offers a much nicer and general way to do the same
|
||||
thing.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Rationale
|
||||
|
||||
While experimenting with alternative implementation ideas to get
|
||||
builtin Zip import, it was discovered that achieving this is
|
||||
built-in Zip import, it was discovered that achieving this is
|
||||
possible with only a fairly small amount of changes to import.c.
|
||||
This allowed to factor out the Zip-specific stuff into a new source
|
||||
file, while at the same time creating a *general* new import hook
|
||||
scheme: the one you're reading about now.
|
||||
|
||||
An earlier design allowed non-string objects on sys.path. Such an
|
||||
object would have the neccesary methods to handle an import. This
|
||||
object would have the necessary methods to handle an import. This
|
||||
has two disadvantages: 1) it breaks code that assumes all items on
|
||||
sys.path are strings; 2) it is not compatible with the PYTHONPATH
|
||||
environment variable. The latter is directly needed for Zip
|
||||
|
@ -146,22 +147,22 @@ Rationale
|
|||
To minimize the impact on import.c as well as to avoid adding extra
|
||||
overhead, it was chosen to not add an explicit hook and importer
|
||||
object for the existing file system import logic (as iu.py has), but
|
||||
to simply fall back to the builtin logic if no hook on
|
||||
to simply fall back to the built-in logic if no hook on
|
||||
sys.path_hooks could handle the path item. If this is the case, a
|
||||
None value is stored in sys.path_importer_cache, again to avoid
|
||||
repeated lookups. (Later we can go further and add a real importer
|
||||
object for the builtin mechanism, for now, the None fallback scheme
|
||||
object for the built-in mechanism, for now, the None fallback scheme
|
||||
should suffice.)
|
||||
|
||||
A question was raised: what about importers that don't need *any*
|
||||
entry on sys.path? (Builtin and frozen modules fall into that
|
||||
entry on sys.path? (Built-in and frozen modules fall into that
|
||||
category.) Again, Gordon McMillan to the rescue: iu.py contains a
|
||||
thing he calls the "metapath". In this PEP's implementation, it's a
|
||||
list of importer objects that is traversed *before* sys.path. This
|
||||
list is yet another new object in the sys.module: sys.meta_path.
|
||||
Currently, this list is empty by default, and frozen and builtin
|
||||
Currently, this list is empty by default, and frozen and built-in
|
||||
module imports are done after traversing sys.meta_path, but still
|
||||
before sys.path. (Again, later we can add real frozen, builtin and
|
||||
before sys.path. (Again, later we can add real frozen, built-in and
|
||||
sys.path importer objects on sys.meta_path, allowing for some extra
|
||||
flexibility, but this could be done as a "phase 2" project, possibly
|
||||
for Python 2.4. It would be the finishing touch as then *every*
|
||||
|
@ -184,12 +185,12 @@ Specification part 1: The Importer Protocol
|
|||
mechanism.
|
||||
|
||||
When an import statement is encountered, the interpreter looks up
|
||||
the __import__ function in the builtin name space. __import__ is
|
||||
the __import__ function in the built-in name space. __import__ is
|
||||
then called with four arguments, amongst which are the name of the
|
||||
module being imported (may be a dotted name) and a reference to the
|
||||
current global namespace.
|
||||
|
||||
The builtin __import__ function (known as PyImport_ImportModuleEx in
|
||||
The built-in __import__ function (known as PyImport_ImportModuleEx in
|
||||
import.c) will then check to see whether the module doing the import
|
||||
is a package by looking for a __path__ variable in the current
|
||||
global namespace. If it is indeed a package, it first tries to do
|
||||
|
@ -231,7 +232,7 @@ Specification part 1: The Importer Protocol
|
|||
module name, for example "spam.eggs.ham". As explained above, when
|
||||
importer.find_module("spam.eggs.ham") is called, "spam.eggs" has
|
||||
already been imported and added to sys.modules. However, the
|
||||
find_module() method isn't neccesarily always called during an
|
||||
find_module() method isn't necessarily always called during an
|
||||
actual import: meta tools that analyze import dependencies (such as
|
||||
freeze, Installer or py2exe) don't actually load modules, so an
|
||||
importer shouldn't *depend* on the parent package being available in
|
||||
|
@ -252,8 +253,8 @@ Specification part 1: The Importer Protocol
|
|||
worst case and multiple loading in the best.
|
||||
|
||||
- The __file__ attribute must be set. This must be a string, but it
|
||||
may be a dummy value, for example "<frozen>". The priviledge of
|
||||
not having a __file__ attribute at all is reserved for builtin
|
||||
may be a dummy value, for example "<frozen>". The privilege of
|
||||
not having a __file__ attribute at all is reserved for built-in
|
||||
modules.
|
||||
|
||||
- If it's a package, the __path__ variable must be set. This must
|
||||
|
@ -262,10 +263,10 @@ Specification part 1: The Importer Protocol
|
|||
|
||||
- It should add an __importer__ attribute to the module, set to the
|
||||
loader object. This is mostly for introspection, but can be used
|
||||
for importer-specific extra's, for example getting data associated
|
||||
for importer-specific extras, for example getting data associated
|
||||
with an importer.
|
||||
|
||||
If the module is a Python module (as opposed to a builtin module or
|
||||
If the module is a Python module (as opposed to a built-in module or
|
||||
an dynamically loaded extension), it should execute the module's
|
||||
code in the module's global name space (module.__dict__).
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -288,7 +289,7 @@ Specification part 2: Registering Hooks
|
|||
There are two types of import hooks: Meta hooks and Path hooks.
|
||||
Meta hooks are called at the start of import processing, before any
|
||||
other import processing (so that meta hooks can override sys.path
|
||||
processing, or frozen modules, or even builtin modules). To
|
||||
processing, or frozen modules, or even built-in modules). To
|
||||
register a meta hook, simply add the importer object to
|
||||
sys.meta_path (the list of registered meta hooks).
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -341,7 +342,7 @@ Packages and the role of __path__
|
|||
also consulted when pkg.__path__ is traversed and importer objects
|
||||
as path items are also allowed (yet, are discouraged for the same
|
||||
reasons as they are discouraged on sys.path, at least for general
|
||||
purpose code). Meta importers don't neccesarily use sys.path at all
|
||||
purpose code). Meta importers don't necessarily use sys.path at all
|
||||
to do their work and therefore may also ignore the value of
|
||||
pkg.__path__. In this case it is still advised to set it to list,
|
||||
which can be empty.
|
||||
|
@ -354,8 +355,8 @@ Integration with the 'imp' module
|
|||
whether it's possible at all without breaking code; it is better to
|
||||
simply add a new function to the imp module. The meaning of the
|
||||
existing imp.find_module() and imp.load_module() calls changes from:
|
||||
"they expose the builtin import mechanism" to "they expose the basic
|
||||
*unhooked* builtin import mechanism". They simply won't invoke any
|
||||
"they expose the built-in import mechanism" to "they expose the basic
|
||||
*unhooked* built-in import mechanism". They simply won't invoke any
|
||||
import hooks. A new imp module function is proposed under the name
|
||||
"find_module2", with is used like the following pattern:
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -404,7 +405,7 @@ Open Issues
|
|||
sys.prefix (or sys.exec_prefix). For example, looking in
|
||||
os.path.join(sys.prefix, "data", package_name).
|
||||
|
||||
- Import hooks could offer a standard way of getting at datafiles
|
||||
- Import hooks could offer a standard way of getting at data files
|
||||
relative to the module file. The standard zipimport object
|
||||
provides a method get_data(name) which returns the content of the
|
||||
"file" called name, as a string. To allow modules to get at the
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue