PEP637 setter notation getitem -> setitem (#1640)

In PEP-0637, in the example discussing setter notation, change the example from `__getitem__` to `__setitem__`, as the former appears to be a mistake in this context.
This commit is contained in:
Gerrit Holl 2020-10-06 17:19:55 +02:00 committed by GitHub
parent a95341328c
commit fd1fbe7329
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23
1 changed files with 1 additions and 1 deletions

View File

@ -462,7 +462,7 @@ With the introduction of the new notation, a few corner cases need to be analyse
2. a similar case occurs with setter notation:: 2. a similar case occurs with setter notation::
# Given type(obj).__getitem__(self, index, value): # Given type(obj).__setitem__(self, index, value):
obj[1, value=3] = 5 obj[1, value=3] = 5
This poses no issue because the value is passed automatically, and the python interpreter will raise This poses no issue because the value is passed automatically, and the python interpreter will raise