PEP 637 allow for unpacking of starargs (#1622)
This commit is contained in:
parent
6ca7702c94
commit
fd40249e4e
35
pep-0637.rst
35
pep-0637.rst
|
@ -270,7 +270,7 @@ The successful implementation of this PEP will result in the following behavior:
|
|||
|
||||
This remains the case even if the index is followed by keywords; see point 5 below.
|
||||
|
||||
3. Comma-seperated arguments are still parsed as a tuple and passed as
|
||||
3. Comma-separated arguments are still parsed as a tuple and passed as
|
||||
a single positional argument::
|
||||
|
||||
obj[spam, eggs]
|
||||
|
@ -347,17 +347,26 @@ The successful implementation of this PEP will result in the following behavior:
|
|||
- but if no ``**kwargs`` parameter is defined, it is an error.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
7. Sequence unpacking remains a syntax error inside subscripts::
|
||||
7. Sequence unpacking is allowed inside subscripts::
|
||||
|
||||
obj[*items]
|
||||
|
||||
Reason: unpacking items would result it being immediately repacked into
|
||||
a tuple. Anyone using sequence unpacking in the subscript is probably
|
||||
confused as to what is happening, and it is best if they receive an
|
||||
immediate syntax error with an informative error message.
|
||||
This allows notations such as ``[:, *args, :]``, which could be treated
|
||||
as ``[(slice(None), *args, slice(None))]``.
|
||||
|
||||
This restriction has however been considered arbitrary by some, and it might
|
||||
be lifted at a later stage for symmetry with kwargs unpacking, see next.
|
||||
The following notation equivalence should be honored::
|
||||
|
||||
obj[*()]
|
||||
# Error. Equivalent to obj[]
|
||||
|
||||
obj[*(), foo=3]
|
||||
# Equivalent to obj[foo=3]
|
||||
|
||||
obj[*(x,)]
|
||||
# Equivalent to obj[x]
|
||||
|
||||
obj[*(x,),]
|
||||
# Equivalent to obj[x,]
|
||||
|
||||
8. Dict unpacking is permitted::
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -365,6 +374,14 @@ The successful implementation of this PEP will result in the following behavior:
|
|||
obj[index, **items]
|
||||
# equivalent to obj[index, spam=1, eggs=2]
|
||||
|
||||
The following notation equivalent should be honored::
|
||||
|
||||
obj[**{}]
|
||||
# Error. Equivalent to obj[]
|
||||
|
||||
obj[3, **{}]
|
||||
# Equivalent to obj[3]
|
||||
|
||||
9. Keyword-only subscripts are permitted. The positional index will be the empty tuple::
|
||||
|
||||
obj[spam=1, eggs=2]
|
||||
|
@ -779,7 +796,7 @@ more than this::
|
|||
obj[1, k=3] # __getitem__(1, k=3). Integer
|
||||
obj[1, 2, k=3] # __getitem__((1, 2), k=3). Tuple
|
||||
|
||||
With the first more in line with a \*args semantics for calling a routine with
|
||||
With the first more in line with a ``*args`` semantics for calling a routine with
|
||||
no positional arguments::
|
||||
|
||||
>>> def foo(*args, **kwargs):
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue