BDFL pronouncements.

Got rid of ^L.
This commit is contained in:
Guido van Rossum 2000-07-27 20:13:39 +00:00
parent ebc3175f87
commit ff898c8e8a
1 changed files with 23 additions and 10 deletions

View File

@ -5,14 +5,14 @@ Owner: tpeters@beopen.com (Tim Peters)
Python-Version: 2.0
Status: Incomplete
Introduction
This PEP describes a proposed syntactical extension to Python, list
comprehensions.
The Proposed Solution
It is proposed to allow conditional construction of list literals using
@ -20,14 +20,14 @@ The Proposed Solution
statements nest now.
Rationale
List comprehensions provide a more concise way to create lists in
situations where map() and filter() and/or nested loops would currently
be used.
Examples
>>> print [i for i in range(10)]
@ -38,17 +38,17 @@ Examples
>>> nums = [1,2,3,4]
>>> fruit = ["Apples", "Peaches", "Pears", "Bananas"]
>>> print [i,f for i in nums for f in fruit]
>>> print [(i,f) for i in nums for f in fruit]
[(1, 'Apples'), (1, 'Peaches'), (1, 'Pears'), (1, 'Bananas'),
(2, 'Apples'), (2, 'Peaches'), (2, 'Pears'), (2, 'Bananas'),
(3, 'Apples'), (3, 'Peaches'), (3, 'Pears'), (3, 'Bananas'),
(4, 'Apples'), (4, 'Peaches'), (4, 'Pears'), (4, 'Bananas')]
>>> print [i,f for i in nums for f in fruit if f[0] == "P"]
>>> print [(i,f) for i in nums for f in fruit if f[0] == "P"]
[(1, 'Peaches'), (1, 'Pears'),
(2, 'Peaches'), (2, 'Pears'),
(3, 'Peaches'), (3, 'Pears'),
(4, 'Peaches'), (4, 'Pears')]
>>> print [i,f for i in nums for f in fruit if f[0] == "P" if i%2 == 1]
>>> print [(i,f) for i in nums for f in fruit if f[0] == "P" if i%2 == 1]
[(1, 'Peaches'), (1, 'Pears'), (3, 'Peaches'), (3, 'Pears')]
>>> def zip(*args):
... return apply(map, (None,)+args)
@ -56,7 +56,7 @@ Examples
>>> print [i for i in zip(nums,fruit) if i[0]%2==0]
[(2, 'Peaches'), (4, 'Bananas')]
Reference Implementation
Please refer to
@ -66,7 +66,20 @@ Reference Implementation
for a patch that adds list comprehensions to Python.
BDFL Pronouncements
Note: the BDFL refers to Guido van Rossum, Python's Benevolent
Dictator For Life.
- The syntax proposed above is the Right One.
- The form [x, y for ...] should be disallowed; one should be
required to write [(x, y) for ...].
- The form [... for x... for y...] nests, with the last index
varying fastest, just like nested for loops.
Open Issues
Syntax
@ -113,7 +126,7 @@ Open Issues
is. It has not had a lot of exercise, though the patch does include
a few test cases.
Local Variables:
mode: indented-text
indent-tabs-mode: nil