Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos 57d9baf04d
Typos found by codespell (#2073)
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
2021-09-17 11:18:24 -07:00
Mariatta cf3bad5ab3
Revert "Rename all .txt PEP files to .rst (GH-462)" (GH-464)
This reverts commit bb0e518ed3.
2017-11-11 11:28:55 -08:00
Huang Huang bb0e518ed3 Rename all .txt PEP files to .rst (GH-462)
For https://github.com/python/peps/issues/1
2017-11-11 10:30:43 -08:00
Nick Coghlan 9a70e511ad Withdraw PEP 531 based on python-ideas discussion 2016-10-30 11:51:23 +10:00
Brett Cannon 308477cea7 Fix some syntax issues preventing code literal rendering 2016-10-28 14:20:14 -07:00
Nick Coghlan d5969080c7 PEP 531: simplify code expansion to match original 2016-10-28 18:35:53 +10:00
Nick Coghlan 7371998040 PEP 531 updates after more time to reflect
- proposed precondition operator is now "?then"
- discusses the possible use of mathematical existence notation
- discusses some of the implications of different design decisions
- assorted other fixes and clarifications
2016-10-28 16:58:17 +10:00
Nick Coghlan 54c54e9b20 PEP 531: minor updates
- fixed some formatting inconsistencies
- explain the reasoning behind ?else and ?or
2016-10-25 18:47:42 +10:00
Nick Coghlan 551e80bcd8 PEP 531: Existence checking operators
Based on the last round of PEP 505 discussions, I'm seeing a
lot more merit in the general idea, but have some strong opinions
on how to describe the concepts to current and new Python users.

Those opinions are different enough from what's currently in PEP
505 that I think writing a competing PEP is the most useful way to
articulate them.
2016-10-25 17:15:18 +10:00