Enforce the use of virtual environments and establish a conventional
name for the virtual environment directory.
Co-authored-by: Pradyun Gedam <pradyunsg@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: C.A.M. Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
Co-authored-by: Zak Johnson <me@zakj.net>
* Use #121212 for dark theme bgcolor
* Use #1111111 for dark theme bgcolor
Co-authored-by: C.A.M. Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
Co-authored-by: C.A.M. Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
* Rename `--without-gil` to `--disable-gil`.
Suggested by Inada Naoki.
* Add two sections to "Rejected Ideas":
- Why Not Deprecate ``PyDict_GetItem`` in Favor of ``PyDict_FetchItem``?
- Why Not Use PEP 683 Immortalization?
* Expand on Python build modes
The SVG image in the "Mind the Gap" section (pep-0495-gap.svg) was incorrect.
It is essentially the same as the the SVG image in the "In the Gap" section (pep-0495-fold.svg).
This is a bug that dates back to the original commit on
2015-08-30 (814d372811)
that uploaded the both the PNG and SVG versions of the Fold and Gap images.
The PNG version of the Gap image is correct, but the SVG version is incorrect.
The replacement SVG image attached in this PR is a manual recreation
of the PNG version of the Gap image that was deleted on 2022-04-23.
It is not exactly the same, but I think it is close enough.
In our original draft to PEP 698, we wanted to emphasize that the
PEP exclusively deals with `@override`, rather than adding new
rules about override type signature.
We did this by stating that compatibility rules were pre-existing.
This is true de-facto, because all type checkers implement at least
some compatibility checks, but upon a careful re-reading it turns out
compatibility checks on subclass methods are not specified in any
PEP.
As a result, we should simply state that this PEP is not adding
any new rules on signatures, without alluding to type checking
rules that are not specified in previous PEPs.
I will separately start a discussion in typing-sig about whether we
want to provide a paper trail in PEPs - either a new PEP or a
light amendment to PEP 484 - to make compatibility checks explicit.
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
Sponsor: Łukasz Langa <lukasz at python.org>
Co-authored-by: Hugo van Kemenade <hugovk@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Qexat <43090614+qexat@users.noreply.github.com>
Since inversion doesn’t just affect brightness, but also hue, there’s a problem: Some background colors have perceptually less contrast with their text when hue rotated. This rotates their hue back, fixing the contrast issue.
* PEP 698: discuss.python.org thread to post-history
As far as I know this is the last update needed ahead of SC
review.
* Also change the Discussions-To header
When the author cancels a PEP, it's Withdrawn. The SC does rejections.
Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: C.A.M. Gerlach <CAM.Gerlach@Gerlach.CAM>
Ken Jin
Pradyun Gedam
Jelle Zijlstra
Hugo van Kemenade
Sam Gross
Brian Park
Eric Snow
Inada Naoki
Steven Troxler
Petr Viktorin
Kushal Das
Semnodime
Martin Fischer
T. Wouters
Łukasz Langa
James Hilton-Balfe
Adam Turner
Ed Swierk
Philipp A
Franek Magiera
Batuhan Taskaya
Pablo Galindo Salgado
Dane Hillard
Paul Moore
Ezio Melotti