python-peps

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Hugo van Kemenade	68160887c2	PEP 366, 395, 413, 426, 430, 440, 531, 535, 3150: Fix footnotes (#2794 )	2022-09-16 08:15:18 +03:00
Adam Turner	113e490701	Several PEPs: Use explicit `:pep:` and `:rfc:` roles (#2209 )	2022-01-21 11:03:51 +00:00
Dimitri Papadopoulos Orfanos	57d9baf04d	Typos found by codespell (#2073 ) Co-authored-by: Jelle Zijlstra <jelle.zijlstra@gmail.com>	2021-09-17 11:18:24 -07:00
Mariatta	cf3bad5ab3	Revert "Rename all .txt PEP files to .rst (GH-462)" (GH-464) This reverts commit `bb0e518ed3`.	2017-11-11 11:28:55 -08:00
Huang Huang	bb0e518ed3	Rename all .txt PEP files to .rst (GH-462) For https://github.com/python/peps/issues/1	2017-11-11 10:30:43 -08:00
Nick Coghlan	9a70e511ad	Withdraw PEP 531 based on python-ideas discussion	2016-10-30 11:51:23 +10:00
Brett Cannon	308477cea7	Fix some syntax issues preventing code literal rendering	2016-10-28 14:20:14 -07:00
Nick Coghlan	d5969080c7	PEP 531: simplify code expansion to match original	2016-10-28 18:35:53 +10:00
Nick Coghlan	7371998040	PEP 531 updates after more time to reflect - proposed precondition operator is now "?then" - discusses the possible use of mathematical existence notation - discusses some of the implications of different design decisions - assorted other fixes and clarifications	2016-10-28 16:58:17 +10:00
Nick Coghlan	54c54e9b20	PEP 531: minor updates - fixed some formatting inconsistencies - explain the reasoning behind ?else and ?or	2016-10-25 18:47:42 +10:00
Nick Coghlan	551e80bcd8	PEP 531: Existence checking operators Based on the last round of PEP 505 discussions, I'm seeing a lot more merit in the general idea, but have some strong opinions on how to describe the concepts to current and new Python users. Those opinions are different enough from what's currently in PEP 505 that I think writing a competing PEP is the most useful way to articulate them.	2016-10-25 17:15:18 +10:00

11 Commits